<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UN &#8220;Peacekeepers&#8221; vandalize ancient rock art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clutch</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12838</link>
		<dc:creator>Clutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12838</guid>
		<description>So place a football in front of the rockface, then pull it away without warning.  But don't spraypaint the frickin thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So place a football in front of the rockface, then pull it away without warning.  But don&#8217;t spraypaint the frickin thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12785</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12785</guid>
		<description>Well, Charlie Brown's shirt has definitely pissed me off once or twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Charlie Brown&#8217;s shirt has definitely pissed me off once or twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clutch</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12777</link>
		<dc:creator>Clutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/139#comment-12777</guid>
		<description>:ohnoes:  :ohnoes:  :ohnoes:  :ohnoes:

Don't tell me the Egyptian army is no more sensible than ours.  Dammit.

Mind you, the Canadian Armed Forces have had a bit of trouble from time to time on the peacekeeping missions, with vandalizing the actual citizens and not just their cultural heritage.  But it's even harder to fathom how the bas-relief could have provoked or threatened the troops...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/disbelief.gif' alt=':ohnoes:' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/disbelief.gif' alt=':ohnoes:' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/disbelief.gif' alt=':ohnoes:' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/disbelief.gif' alt=':ohnoes:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell me the Egyptian army is no more sensible than ours.  Dammit.</p>
<p>Mind you, the Canadian Armed Forces have had a bit of trouble from time to time on the peacekeeping missions, with vandalizing the actual citizens and not just their cultural heritage.  But it&#8217;s even harder to fathom how the bas-relief could have provoked or threatened the troops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
