<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleopatra&#8217;s murdered sister?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:03:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/comment-page-1#comment-33285</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=2245#comment-33285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the Kennewick Man controversy is aptly placed under the reductionist, pseudo-nationalist umbrella. There are other issues in play there -- ancestor worship, the religious bond to a specific geography, the long history of callous treatment of native human remains -- that don&#039;t quite match the Afrocentrism and Sinocentrism of the other two examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure the Kennewick Man controversy is aptly placed under the reductionist, pseudo-nationalist umbrella. There are other issues in play there &#8212; ancestor worship, the religious bond to a specific geography, the long history of callous treatment of native human remains &#8212; that don&#8217;t quite match the Afrocentrism and Sinocentrism of the other two examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/comment-page-1#comment-30458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=2245#comment-30458</guid>
		<description>The phenomenon of ascribing uniquely African characteristics to people who are, ultimately, as much a part of the Mediterranean as anywhere, is part of the same reductionist, pseudo-nationalist nonsense that drove a certain Native American tribe to claim Kennewick Man and deny him to the Smithsonian, or the Chinese to decapitate Uighur mummies with caucasoid skull types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phenomenon of ascribing uniquely African characteristics to people who are, ultimately, as much a part of the Mediterranean as anywhere, is part of the same reductionist, pseudo-nationalist nonsense that drove a certain Native American tribe to claim Kennewick Man and deny him to the Smithsonian, or the Chinese to decapitate Uighur mummies with caucasoid skull types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/comment-page-1#comment-27948</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=2245#comment-27948</guid>
		<description>Understandably so. There&#039;s plenty of bah humbug to go around on this story.  :facepalm:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understandably so. There&#8217;s plenty of bah humbug to go around on this story.  <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/facepalm.gif' alt=':facepalm:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sv</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/comment-page-1#comment-27935</link>
		<dc:creator>sv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=2245#comment-27935</guid>
		<description>seriously?
Thats it not paying the t.v license any more.
wow, kinda negative today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously?<br />
Thats it not paying the t.v license any more.<br />
wow, kinda negative today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/2245/comment-page-1#comment-27924</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=2245#comment-27924</guid>
		<description>No kidding. And there&#039;s a sensationalist BBC &quot;documentary&quot; to air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding. And there&#8217;s a sensationalist BBC &#8220;documentary&#8221; to air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
