<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60 Minutes does the James Ossuary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14511</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14511</guid>
		<description>They did. He was indicted for forgery and is still on trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did. He was indicted for forgery and is still on trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14510</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14510</guid>
		<description>The evidence suggests tampering to me as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evidence suggests tampering to me as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14509</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14509</guid>
		<description>Thank you for reposting it. It's a disappointing statement, at times unprofessionally flippant on a subject that anyone who truly cares for and values antiquities and the knowledge they can bring us should approach due respect to the principle of protecting our cultural heritage.

I'll respond to it in more detail in an upcoming entry. :thanks:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for reposting it. It&#8217;s a disappointing statement, at times unprofessionally flippant on a subject that anyone who truly cares for and values antiquities and the knowledge they can bring us should approach due respect to the principle of protecting our cultural heritage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll respond to it in more detail in an upcoming entry. <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/thanks.gif' alt=':thanks:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braidy B.</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14501</link>
		<dc:creator>Braidy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14501</guid>
		<description>I wonder if they arrested that guy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they arrested that guy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14498</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/252#comment-14498</guid>
		<description>I'm almost completely sure that that guy faked most of that inscription. Well, the "brother of Juses" part...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost completely sure that that guy faked most of that inscription. Well, the &#8220;brother of Juses&#8221; part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
