<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;How Art Made the World&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pitshade</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>pitshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I'd need at least two whole rabbits to pick up anything this far back in the hills...

Let us know what you think of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d need at least two whole rabbits to pick up anything this far back in the hills&#8230;</p>
<p>Let us know what you think of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Oh what a pity. No chance of PBS coming through with rabbit ears?

I had forgotten that discussion in Blade Runner.  I'll keep it in mind while I watch tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh what a pity. No chance of PBS coming through with rabbit ears?</p>
<p>I had forgotten that discussion in Blade Runner.  I&#8217;ll keep it in mind while I watch tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitshade</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>pitshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/26#comment-51</guid>
		<description>The first episode is entitled, 'More Human Than Human' so that's a plus in itself. It makes me consider the way that Blade Runner questioned what it meant to be human, contrasted with the statement, "That's why representations of the human body throughout history usually are not realistic." Of course the movie was made in Hollywood, but the bodies of the replicants weren't exactly the human norm.

Too bad my cable is gone, though it got hard to justify the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first episode is entitled, &#8216;More Human Than Human&#8217; so that&#8217;s a plus in itself. It makes me consider the way that Blade Runner questioned what it meant to be human, contrasted with the statement, &#8220;That&#8217;s why representations of the human body throughout history usually are not realistic.&#8221; Of course the movie was made in Hollywood, but the bodies of the replicants weren&#8217;t exactly the human norm.</p>
<p>Too bad my cable is gone, though it got hard to justify the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
