Comments on: First Stonehenge dig in 40 years http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266 History fetish? What history fetish? Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:38:40 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Pete http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266/comment-page-1#comment-14650 Pete Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:29:38 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266#comment-14650 I agree. :skull: :skull: I agree. :skull: :skull:

]]> By: livius drusus http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266/comment-page-1#comment-14639 livius drusus Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:44:35 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266#comment-14639 There are so many different aspects of Stonehenge still to be studied. We'll be learning stuff about it until we're dead, I'm sure. There are so many different aspects of Stonehenge still to be studied. We’ll be learning stuff about it until we’re dead, I’m sure.

]]> By: Pete http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266/comment-page-1#comment-14635 Pete Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:56:42 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/266#comment-14635 Stonhenge has always been interesting... now that there diging the sight it become eaven more interesting. I'll try and watch more. Stonhenge has always been interesting… now that there diging the sight it become eaven more interesting. I’ll try and watch more.

]]>