<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angkor Buddha&#8217;s missing legs found</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/comment-page-1#comment-39072</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=3885#comment-39072</guid>
		<description>I have stared at that picture every which way and I can safely claim that I have no idea what the hell is going on with that rock. Is that a bended knee on the right? No idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have stared at that picture every which way and I can safely claim that I have no idea what the hell is going on with that rock. Is that a bended knee on the right? No idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/comment-page-1#comment-39071</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=3885#comment-39071</guid>
		<description>Oh, indeed. I would say conservation is more of a priority than discovery right now, especially in inimical climates. Then there&#039;s the whole land mine issue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, indeed. I would say conservation is more of a priority than discovery right now, especially in inimical climates. Then there&#8217;s the whole land mine issue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/comment-page-1#comment-39070</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=3885#comment-39070</guid>
		<description>Pictures can usually be found. In this day and age, entire archaeological projects can be put online, complete with Flickr accounts full of pictures.

You just have to look around a little bit, because the local media who often carry stories of historical import don&#039;t always include an expensive wire service picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pictures can usually be found. In this day and age, entire archaeological projects can be put online, complete with Flickr accounts full of pictures.</p>
<p>You just have to look around a little bit, because the local media who often carry stories of historical import don&#8217;t always include an expensive wire service picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lemming</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/comment-page-1#comment-38977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=3885#comment-38977</guid>
		<description>:ohnoes: Those legs look like a rock. The base in the background is looking pretty good; though whether that&#039;s the base for this same piece is unclear to me, as there seems to be something square(-ish) in the bottom left of the pic that matches the condition of the legs much more than the one in the back. But that could actually be a rock. Like a real rock, not the leg-rock.  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/disbelief.gif' alt=':ohnoes:' class='wp-smiley' /> Those legs look like a rock. The base in the background is looking pretty good; though whether that&#8217;s the base for this same piece is unclear to me, as there seems to be something square(-ish) in the bottom left of the pic that matches the condition of the legs much more than the one in the back. But that could actually be a rock. Like a real rock, not the leg-rock.  <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/laugh.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/3885/comment-page-1#comment-38940</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=3885#comment-38940</guid>
		<description>Fantastic piece. Buddhist antiquities have always held a special appeal to me. Laos has treasures yet to be discovered, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic piece. Buddhist antiquities have always held a special appeal to me. Laos has treasures yet to be discovered, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

