<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Museum Directors make Super Bowl bet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:03:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632/comment-page-1#comment-43075</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=4632#comment-43075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m delighted to report the reactions are uniformly positive and entertaining. http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4685</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m delighted to report the reactions are uniformly positive and entertaining. <a href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4685" rel="nofollow">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4685</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCam</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632/comment-page-1#comment-43074</link>
		<dc:creator>RCam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=4632#comment-43074</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to the reactions, now that the Saints have won!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to the reactions, now that the Saints have won!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632/comment-page-1#comment-42918</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=4632#comment-42918</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s more of a citywide dick measurement they&#039;re comparing. :giggle:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more of a citywide dick measurement they&#8217;re comparing. <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/giggle.gif' alt=':giggle:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/4632/comment-page-1#comment-42917</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=4632#comment-42917</guid>
		<description>Hilarity ensues. Who knew museum directors could get in such a dick measuring contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarity ensues. Who knew museum directors could get in such a dick measuring contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
