<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where London&#8217;s bodies are buried</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16348</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16348</guid>
		<description>:giggle:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/giggle.gif' alt=':giggle:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironymetrics</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16254</link>
		<dc:creator>ironymetrics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16254</guid>
		<description>-"Who's that then?"
-"I don't know, must be a king."
-"Why?"
-"He hasn't got shit all over him."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-&#8221;Who&#8217;s that then?&#8221;<br />
-&#8221;I don&#8217;t know, must be a king.&#8221;<br />
-&#8221;Why?&#8221;<br />
-&#8221;He hasn&#8217;t got shit all over him.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16247</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16247</guid>
		<description>Okay, fair point about the hidden syphillis. The rickets and bad teeth must have been clearly visible to her clientele, though. Her rates must have been a bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, fair point about the hidden syphillis. The rickets and bad teeth must have been clearly visible to her clientele, though. Her rates must have been a bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16205</link>
		<dc:creator>TomJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16205</guid>
		<description>The hallmark of any successful organism is that it allows itself time to be transmitted. The etiologic agent of syphilis, &lt;i&gt;Treponema pallidum&lt;/i&gt;, is no exception. &lt;i&gt;T. pallidum&lt;/i&gt; begins with a single sore, and in women it may be internal to the reproductive system ... thereby escaping detection. This sore quickly heals, and is often non-painful. The second-stage, which can appear months after infection are typically rash-like outbreaks on the skin, and lesions on mucous membranes. For women, these lesions are once again, typically internal ... so they can infect multiple people who will only know afterward they've been infected ... and by then, they may not be able to trace who gave them chancre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hallmark of any successful organism is that it allows itself time to be transmitted. The etiologic agent of syphilis, <i>Treponema pallidum</i>, is no exception. <i>T. pallidum</i> begins with a single sore, and in women it may be internal to the reproductive system &#8230; thereby escaping detection. This sore quickly heals, and is often non-painful. The second-stage, which can appear months after infection are typically rash-like outbreaks on the skin, and lesions on mucous membranes. For women, these lesions are once again, typically internal &#8230; so they can infect multiple people who will only know afterward they&#8217;ve been infected &#8230; and by then, they may not be able to trace who gave them chancre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16203</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/480#comment-16203</guid>
		<description>Koo-koo-cachoo! :chicken:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koo-koo-cachoo! <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/chicken.gif' alt=':chicken:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
