http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57 History fetish? What history fetish? Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:19:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-20456 livius drusus Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:49:23 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-20456 Thank you for commenting. Old or new, I'm delighted to get the feedback, especially when it's first-hand testimony. :thanks: Thank you for commenting. Old or new, I’m delighted to get the feedback, especially when it’s first-hand testimony.

]]> http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-20151 Erika Mailman Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:47:24 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-20151 Sorry-- I know I'm commenting on an old post. I visited the Shroud of Turin museum a few years ago and thought that the narrative plaques were very fair in disclosing that the shroud dated to the medieval period. There was a lot of fascinating stuff about burn marks from the edge of the metal box it was kept in when there was a fire...a really fascinating artifact. Sorry– I know I’m commenting on an old post. I visited the Shroud of Turin museum a few years ago and thought that the narrative plaques were very fair in disclosing that the shroud dated to the medieval period. There was a lot of fascinating stuff about burn marks from the edge of the metal box it was kept in when there was a fire…a really fascinating artifact.

]]> http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-14641 livius drusus Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:47:51 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-14641 :lol:

]]> http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-14637 Pete Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:07:11 +0000 http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/57#comment-14637 I diddn't need to know that... I diddn’t need to know that…

]]>