<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head of France&#8217;s King Henry IV identified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035</link>
	<description>History fetish? What history fetish?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido MacFawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-705557</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido MacFawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-705557</guid>
		<description>Well said, guid Heather. Ye thumped the &quot;Monkey&#039;s Wristwatch&quot; &#039;pon his napper and nailed his virtual lugs to the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, guid Heather. Ye thumped the &#8220;Monkey&#8217;s Wristwatch&#8221; &#8216;pon his napper and nailed his virtual lugs to the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido MacFawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-705530</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido MacFawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-705530</guid>
		<description>Respect for the truths of science and the edification of historical knowledge trumps any &quot;respect for the dead&quot; -- especially if forensic science is conducted respectfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respect for the truths of science and the edification of historical knowledge trumps any &#8220;respect for the dead&#8221; &#8212; especially if forensic science is conducted respectfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrun</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-202105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-202105</guid>
		<description>Dear Livius,

Thank you for posting so many great articles on your blog.  I was especially fascinated by this particular one about Henri IV.  In his portraits, the French king sometimes looked a little peculiar - the facial reconstruction, however, shows a good-looking man.
Interesting details also about earring use.  I recently saw a painting of Henri&#039;s brother-in-law, Henri III, in which the latter sports a rather large earring.   :yes: 
Some of your blog readers have commented that the forensic examination of Henri&#039;s head shows little respect for the dead, but you stated that he will be officially reburied at St. Denis this year.   
I am currently working on a biography of Anna of Saxony (1544-77).  She was said to be misshapen and rather unattractive.  Because of her scandalous lifestyle, her family had her buried in an unmarked grave in Meissen Cathedral, near Dresden, Germany.  I wish authorities would allow the exhumation of her body to shed light on her alleged disabilities.  
If you are interested, here is my blog on Anna:
http://princessesofgermany.blogspot.com/

Best wishes from a fellow historian,
Ingrun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Livius,</p>
<p>Thank you for posting so many great articles on your blog.  I was especially fascinated by this particular one about Henri IV.  In his portraits, the French king sometimes looked a little peculiar &#8211; the facial reconstruction, however, shows a good-looking man.<br />
Interesting details also about earring use.  I recently saw a painting of Henri&#8217;s brother-in-law, Henri III, in which the latter sports a rather large earring.   <img src='http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/nod.gif' alt=':yes:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Some of your blog readers have commented that the forensic examination of Henri&#8217;s head shows little respect for the dead, but you stated that he will be officially reburied at St. Denis this year.<br />
I am currently working on a biography of Anna of Saxony (1544-77).  She was said to be misshapen and rather unattractive.  Because of her scandalous lifestyle, her family had her buried in an unmarked grave in Meissen Cathedral, near Dresden, Germany.  I wish authorities would allow the exhumation of her body to shed light on her alleged disabilities.<br />
If you are interested, here is my blog on Anna:<br />
<a href="http://princessesofgermany.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://princessesofgermany.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Best wishes from a fellow historian,<br />
Ingrun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-60942</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-60942</guid>
		<description>Your a pretty ignorant fool. 

Lets see all of your years behind a microscope that give your argument ANY merit if all. 

Did you not even read the article at all? Let me Repeat the facts that you CLEARLY missed. 

a 19-person multidisciplinary team composed of forensic anthropologists, archaeologists, geneticists and even perfumers examined the head

NINETEEN PEOPLE. Who have gone to school, graduated and dedicate their ENTIRE lives to their work. Do you not know ANYTHING about anthropology?

I will dumb it down for you because clearly you need it.

&quot;Radiocarbon dating returned a date range of between 1450 and 1650; Henry was assassinated in 1610&quot;

( I&#039;m almost positive that there were no &#039; warriors that wore &#039;bones&#039; in their ears in 1610 and in all places Australia? where do you even GET this rediculous information)

Many royal Kings wore earrings. Read a book. Learn some history....

&quot; the embalming method matched the very specific technique used at Henry’s request&quot;

Henry SPECIFICALLY requested to be embalmed “in the style of the Italians.” 

Which Mnimises mutilation. Which dumbed down means they did not open the skull, they did not touch the brain, and left all internal structures intact.They left it ALONE. Which is NOT typically done in embalmings.

Before you go making ignorant comments like this, you should probably stop talking for a while seeing as how you know absolutely nothing about anything especially anthropologically speaking.

Read a book every once in a while. Fool... I don&#039;t even understand why people like you are allowed to even speak out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your a pretty ignorant fool. </p>
<p>Lets see all of your years behind a microscope that give your argument ANY merit if all. </p>
<p>Did you not even read the article at all? Let me Repeat the facts that you CLEARLY missed. </p>
<p>a 19-person multidisciplinary team composed of forensic anthropologists, archaeologists, geneticists and even perfumers examined the head</p>
<p>NINETEEN PEOPLE. Who have gone to school, graduated and dedicate their ENTIRE lives to their work. Do you not know ANYTHING about anthropology?</p>
<p>I will dumb it down for you because clearly you need it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Radiocarbon dating returned a date range of between 1450 and 1650; Henry was assassinated in 1610&#8243;</p>
<p>( I&#8217;m almost positive that there were no &#8216; warriors that wore &#8216;bones&#8217; in their ears in 1610 and in all places Australia? where do you even GET this rediculous information)</p>
<p>Many royal Kings wore earrings. Read a book. Learn some history&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8221; the embalming method matched the very specific technique used at Henry’s request&#8221;</p>
<p>Henry SPECIFICALLY requested to be embalmed “in the style of the Italians.” </p>
<p>Which Mnimises mutilation. Which dumbed down means they did not open the skull, they did not touch the brain, and left all internal structures intact.They left it ALONE. Which is NOT typically done in embalmings.</p>
<p>Before you go making ignorant comments like this, you should probably stop talking for a while seeing as how you know absolutely nothing about anything especially anthropologically speaking.</p>
<p>Read a book every once in a while. Fool&#8230; I don&#8217;t even understand why people like you are allowed to even speak out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59896</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59896</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/henry-alive-101214-02.jpg&quot;/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thehistoryblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/henry-alive-101214-02.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulgar</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59875</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59875</guid>
		<description>If thats King Henry IV&#039;s head then I&#039;m a monkeys wristwatch. No DNA evidence indeed! And show me a friggen portrait that has him wearing an earring of any kind on either ears at any time!

He may be a king to you but to me he be a Clever Man, a Karadji. Due to the size of the piercing in his ear, i am guessing he may have had a bone through it at some point, a fashion which I am certain was never adopted by men of the valois court. The blackened skin, the deliberate decapitation marks, the red and white ochre in his hair etc etc

I reckon that head belongs in Australia to be buried with the Warrior it adorned - Bembilwyam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats King Henry IV&#8217;s head then I&#8217;m a monkeys wristwatch. No DNA evidence indeed! And show me a friggen portrait that has him wearing an earring of any kind on either ears at any time!</p>
<p>He may be a king to you but to me he be a Clever Man, a Karadji. Due to the size of the piercing in his ear, i am guessing he may have had a bone through it at some point, a fashion which I am certain was never adopted by men of the valois court. The blackened skin, the deliberate decapitation marks, the red and white ochre in his hair etc etc</p>
<p>I reckon that head belongs in Australia to be buried with the Warrior it adorned &#8211; Bembilwyam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estara</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59489</link>
		<dc:creator>Estara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59489</guid>
		<description>True, true That&#039;s honorable all right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, true That&#8217;s honorable all right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59461</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59461</guid>
		<description>At least the most recent owner had the decency to hand it over. He must have known he wouldn&#039;t get it back no matter what the results, so in that sense at least there&#039;s honor to be found among the centuries of degradation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the most recent owner had the decency to hand it over. He must have known he wouldn&#8217;t get it back no matter what the results, so in that sense at least there&#8217;s honor to be found among the centuries of degradation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estara</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59456</link>
		<dc:creator>Estara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59456</guid>
		<description>Oh. Yay. &quot;I have the KINGS head in my personal library! It&#039;s a royal paperweight!&quot;
Gross.
What happened to honor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. Yay. &#8220;I have the KINGS head in my personal library! It&#8217;s a royal paperweight!&#8221;<br />
Gross.<br />
What happened to honor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livius drusus</title>
		<link>http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/9035/comment-page-1#comment-59437</link>
		<dc:creator>livius drusus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehistoryblog.com/?p=9035#comment-59437</guid>
		<description>Yarly. Especially when you know who the head used to be so it&#039;s not like there&#039;s any scientific detachment involved. It&#039;s a really goulish form of starfucking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yarly. Especially when you know who the head used to be so it&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s any scientific detachment involved. It&#8217;s a really goulish form of starfucking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
