Exhibit to reunite art from Kennedy’s last hotel room

JFK speaking outside Hotel Texas the morning of November 22nd, 1963It’s not the kind of art you usually find on hotel room walls. The artworks that surrounded John and Jacqueline Kennedy on the last night of his life were not just of museum quality but were actual museum pieces, assembled by art lovers from local institutions and private collections to turn a mundane hotel suite into an impromptu art installation of the highest calibre.

In the days before President John Kennedy’s trip to Texas, the hotel accommodations arranged for the President and First Lady in Fort Worth were the subject of some discussion in local papers. Their schedule had been released to the public. The President and First Lady would spend the night of Thursday, November 21st in Suite 850 of the Hotel Texas in Fort Worth, which would also be the venue of a fundraising $100-a-plate breakfast the next morning sponsored by the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce. After the breakfast, they would take a short flight to Love Field and drive right through downtown Dallas in a motorcade before heading to a luncheon.

Parlor of Suite 850, Lyonel Feininger's "Manhattan II" left of the windowDescriptions of Suite 850 made the local press, and even the national wire services got in the action when they found out the Will Rogers Suite at the Hotel Texas where the Vice President and Mrs. Johnson would be staying cost $100 a night while the Kennedy’s unnamed suite ran $75 dollars a night. Next to the Will Rogers Suite’s western-themed decor, Suite 850’s “Chinese modern,” whatever that means, must have seemed downright drab. The hotel said the suite had been selected because it “has brighter colors and would be more to the liking of the Kennedys.”

It was not, however, to the liking of James Owen Day, part-time art critic for the Fort Worth Press. Day worked in the public relations office of rotorcraft manufacturer Bell Helicopter but had a passion for art which he fulfilled by painting, taking photographs and covering art stories for the Press. He came by it honestly. His great-grandfather Thomas Patton Day had settled in Fort Worth in 1876, opening a tintype studio. He also dug the first artesian well in town and as a result had the first bathtub with running water.

Suite 850 parlor, Eros Pellini nude on the coffee table, cheesy "Chinese modern" screen on the wallOwen Day wanted the aesthetic taste of Fort Worth to be represented in grander style than the “Chinese modern” of Hotel Texas could provide. He contacted Samuel Benton Cantey III, an art collector and president of the Fort Worth Art Association, who in turn contacted his friend Ruth Carter Johnson, daughter of Amon G. Carter, founder of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram who had died in 1955 and willed that a public museum be built from his extensive art collection. The Amon Carter Museum of American Art opened in 1961, and Ruth Carter Johnson was president of the board. Together they came up with a hugely ambitious solution to the Suite 850 dilemma. They would turn the three-room suite into a three-part art exhibition specifically tailored to the tastes of the President and First Lady, featuring works by the finest American and European artists.

The Parlor featured the work of impressionist painter Claude Monet, alongside works of modern sculpture and painting, including a bronze sculpture, Angry Owl, by Picasso, 1951–53; an oil painting of Manhattan by American expressionist Lyonel Feininger, 1940; an oil on paper study by Franz Kline, 1954; and a bronze sculpture by Henry Moore, 1939–40.

The Master Bedroom, which was designated as Jacqueline Kennedy’s bedroom, was adorned with impressionist masterworks, per her well-known affinity for the genre. The room included Summer Day in the Park, 1918–23, by Maurice Brazil Prendergast; van Gogh’s Road with Peasant Shouldering a Spade, 1887; John Marin’s watercolor Sea and Rocks, 1919; and Bassin de Deauville, an oil on canvas by Raoul Dufy.

The Second Bedroom, the president’s room, featured late 19th-century and early 20th-century American art, including Thomas Eakins’ Swimming, 1884–85; Marsden Hartley’s Sombrero with Gloves, 1936; and Charles Marion Russell’s Lost in a Snowstorm, 1888; among others.

Delivered to the hotel by couriers and station wagons, the art collection was set up in the suite on the day of the Kennedys’ arrival. The President and First Lady arrived so late, however, that they went to sleep without realizing that their Chinese modern suite was actually a miniature MoMA. It wasn’t until they awoke the next morning that they noticed the marvels around them. Before they left the hotel to meet their sad fate in Dallas, Mrs. Kennedy called Ruth Carter Johnson to thank her.

Second bedroom of Suite 850, Eakins' "Swimming Hole" (left) and Russell's "Lost in a Snowstorm" (right)The tragic events of that day would of course overshadow the remarkable story of the world-class museum assembled in a $75-a-night hotel suite. In the decades since, most of the art works have been sold and dispersed to other cities. The only ones still in Fort Worth are Thomas Eakins’ Swimming Hole and Charles Marion Russell’s Lost in a Snowstorm which are part of the Carter’s permanent collection.

Hotel Texas: An Art Exhibition for the President and Mrs. John F. Kennedy will bring the Suite 850 collection together again for the first time since November 22nd, 1963. In commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy, the exhibit will open next year at the Dallas Museum of Art on May 26th and will run through September 15th. It will then move to the Amon Carter Museum of American Art where it will be on display from October 12th through January 12th, 2014. That means it will be at the Carter on the 50th anniversary of its installation in the Hotel Texas, an appropriate setting given Ruth’s personal involvement.

Etruscan pyramids found carved out of Orvieto caves

OrvietoThe city of Orvieto in the central Italian region of Umbria is perched atop a vertiginous cliff of a soft volcanic ash stone called tufa or tuff. The appeal of its excellent natural defenses has kept it continuously populated from Etruscan times onward, and its vast panoply of underground tunnels and chambers, first dug out of the tufa by the Etruscans, has been used by the residents ever since. A census of the labyrinth underneath the city documented 1200 caves/tunnels/cavities of various shapes and sizes, and there are many more than that which have never been documented.

Excavating Etruscan cavern carved in pyramid shape under OrvietoIn an archaeological first, a group of alumni and students from St. Anselm College in New Hampshire led by classics professor David George and Claudio Bizzarri of the Parco Archeologico Ambientale dell’Orvietano has found that at least two of those caves were carved by the Etruscans in the shape of a pyramid. Etruscans did a lot of digging and central Italy is flush with their underground tomb cities, but none of those structures so far as we know start with a narrow peak that gets progressively wider as you go down to the square base.

On May 21st, the team began to dig under an Orvieto cellar with a fascinatingly checkered history. In the 1950s it was a furniture shop. The tools and work benches are still in place. In the 1920s and 30s it was used by renowned painter and ceramic artist Ilario Ciaurro who had a kiln in the space and produced pieces heavily influenced by Orvieto’s ancient and medieval past. In the first two decades of the 1900s, the cellar was also used for making pottery, but not the innocent bowl-and-teapot kind. This was the workshop of the notorious Riccardi brothers, a family of artifact forgers who duped major institutions like the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the British Museum.

Fake Etruscan colossus and head on display at the MetTheir most spectacular coup happened between 1915 and 1921 when they sold the Met three purported Etruscan statues — one life-sized terracotta warrior, one colossal warrior and one colossal head — that they had of course made themselves in the Orvieto cave. The Met was committed to its deception even though many experts in Italy knew or strongly suspected the statues were fakes. Actually, art historical expertise wasn’t even necessary to spot the fraud, because apparently the exposed genitals of the colossal warrior (Etruscans often depicted their warriors naked from the waist down) were modeled after those of Riccardo Riccardi himself, and a number of the young ladies in town had recognized them.

The Met just wrapped itself in denial and kept the fakes in public view until 1959 when a visiting Italian scholar declined the opportunity to inspect the pieces. He told the curators he had no need to see them because he knew the man who had made them. That was the last straw. They ran some chemical tests in 1960 and discovered the presence of manganese, a substance the Etruscans never used, in the glaze. The statues were hustled off to storage, and the Met had to make a rare public announcement that exposed their own tender bits to general hooting.

Etruscan pyramidal caveAt a level just slightly below the cellar with its delicious recent history, archaeologists found passageways of Etruscan construction. They also found some steps dug into the wall that bore the mark of Etruscan carving, so they kept digging down to see where the steps might lead. They were intrigued to see that the walls were tapering outwards, getting wider apart the further down they went.

Fragment of Etruscan bucchero cup from the fill, 6th c. B.C.In short order they reached a medieval floor from the early 13th century. Just underneath the medieval floor was a layer of fill composed of fragments of ancient Etruscan and Greek pottery from the 5th and 6th centuries B.C. There was nothing at all from the interim period. The layers went abruptly from 1200 A.D. to 400 B.C. Some of the Etruscan fragments in the fill were considerably more ancient, dating as far back as 1200 B.C.

Tunnel between pyramids one and twoUnderneath that was another layer five feet deep of grey sterile fill which had been poured into the cave from a hole in the top. The next layer was filled with brown material which the team is currently excavating. It dates to the mid-5th century B.C. At this depth, around 16 feet (5 meters) below the surface, excavations have revealed an Etruscan tunnel of the same age going from one pyramid cave into another one right next to it. The second pyramid appears to be older than the first, carved before the 5th century B.C.

Bizzarri believes there may be five of these pyramidal cavities under the city. These are the only two that have begun to be excavated, though. Since the pyramid shape has not been found anywhere else in Etruria, there are no comparable finds to help explain what the space’s intended use might have been.

“We know it’s not a quarry or a cistern; the walls are too well dressed to be a quarry and there is no evidence of mud which would point to a cistern. That leaves just a couple of things, some sort of a religious structure or a tomb, both of which are without precedent here,” says George.

The answer may be found at the bottom of the pyramid, but the steps are still going strong and archaeologists have no idea how far down this structure may go. Based on another find with similar steps which was unfortunately not excavated by archaeologists but by looters, Bizzarri speculates that they may have another 40+ feet to dig through before they reach the final layer.

You can take a virtual stroll through the excavation in the following video. It’s in Italian, but it’s worth seeing just for the view. I’ve listed a few salient points and the times they appear below.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHfo2NDFHho&t=55s&w=430]

Ads until 0:55 then a brief intro
1:23 A few atmosphere shots of the current excavation layer.
1:33 Bizzarri is at the entrance to the cavity, which is number 254 according to the great census of the man-made caves under Orvieto. He talks about who’s involved in the dig and how forbearing the owner had been to let them poke around like this.
2:15 This cave is of particular interest because it was put to many of the uses characteristic of these cavities for millennia. Obviously their interests as archaeologists lie in the more ancient life of the space, but the overall slices of history from ancient Etruscan to mid-century modern make this cavern unique and special.
2:45 He starts off taking a left to go down the passageway to the current layer they’re excavating.
3:15 The platform he’s standing on is at a level just below the floor of the surface dwelling, so the basement, basically, looking down at the mid-5th c. B.C. layer. The whole space was previously filled and has now been excavated.
4:16 He points out the walls widening at the base.
4:25 He points out the steps.
4:45 He points out the Etruscan tunnel (cunicolo) into the second pyramid.
5:00 David George says a bit about how the cave is unique, that there are no comparables.
6:15 Bizzarri goes back out towards the entrance.
6:25 He’s now in 20th c. space.
6:40 Points out the 1950s furniture shop with tools, work surfaces, supports for the electrical motors.
7:00 Before that it was used as a kiln for art ceramics by Ciaurro, and before that as a workshop for forging antiquities by the Riccardi brothers.
7:33 Tells the Met warrior story, noting that the director of the Met told people when he was in Etruria that he was looking for large Etruscan artifacts, not the usual small vases and pieces no matter how scientifically interesting or beautiful, so the Riccardi made him some.
8:15 He says they’re hoping to find some fragments from the Riccardi oeuvre so they can do an exhibit of Orvieto fakes.
8:25 Reports on another famous Riccardi fake exported from Orvieto: a bronze two-horse chariot (biga) that was sold to the British Museum.
9:00 Heads back to the dig going all the way down to the current level they’re surveying for stratigraphic data.
9:47 Doesn’t know how far down they’ll go and what surprises they may find.

1,600-square-foot Roman mosaic unearthed in Turkey

A team of archaeologists and students from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Atatürk University and local workers have uncovered a massive 1600-square-foot Roman mosaic in the ancient town of Antiochia ad Cragum near modern-day Guney on the southern coast of Turkey. The geometric black-and-white mosaic dates to the third or fourth century A.D. and is in excellent condition.

Its condition is particularly impressive given that it was first discovered in 2001 after a farmer turned up some ancient mosaic tiles (tesserae) while plowing the land. Purdue University classics professor Nick Rauh, director of an archaeological survey of the ancient standing architecture in the region, saw the tesserae when he walked through the plowed field. He alerted his team members and experts from the archeological museum in Alanya, 40 miles up the coast.

Although the find was certainly intriguing, located as it was adjacent to the standing remains of a Roman bath structure, the Alanya Museum did not have the funds to excavate further at that time. They returned two years later and revealed a small sliver of the mosaic, then stopped again.

In 2005, the University of Nebraska team under director Michael Hoff began a new research project focusing on the Roman Antiochia ad Cragum. Hoff had been a member of Nick Rauh’s survey team in 2001, so he personally remembered the discovery of the tiles but this project was focused on surveying the third-century Northeast Temple. In 2008 they were granted a full permit by the Archaeological Directorate of the Turkish Ministry of Culture to excavate the temple and the rest of the city, but excavations on the temple didn’t begin until 2009.

Last year the Alanya Museum secured a permit to explore the mosaic further. They invited Michael Hoff’s team to fully excavate the mosaic, clean it and conserve it so tourists and scholars can see it in all its glory. This year’s large team — in addition to the experts from three universities there are 35 students from diverse disciplines like journalism and art participating in the 2012 field school — began to uncover the rest of the mosaic this July.

The more soil they removed, the more mosaic they found, ultimately revealing an entire floor decorated with modular square after modular square of different geometric themes done in black and white opus tessellatum (large marble tesserae) style. With an estimated 40% of the mosaic uncovered, 1600 square feet have been revealed. The curved edge of a 25-foot-long marble-lined bath has also been revealed. The mosaic leads right up to it, so it was a formal poolside pavement.

The pool was uncovered, open to the sun and elements, but piers that once held a roof over the mosaic pavement are still in place. Mosaics in this style were often created to reflect roof elements, so for example each large square with one geometric design could have had a section of roof above it that was the same dimension. By the peak of the Roman Empire, this was the most popular style of mosaics all over Roman territory. It was easier to create than figurative mosaic and the larger tesserae were easier and faster to install.

However, this particular example is exceptionally high quality. It size and detail is not the kind of thing you’d expect to see in a small town in the far reaches of empire. Antiochia ad Cragum was fully Romanized and was very well-appointed with baths, temples, markets, but it was hardly a great capital and it was in a region called Rough Cilicia, best known as the home base for the much-dreaded Cilician pirates who found the profusion of coastal coves and inlets created by the meeting of the Cragus mountains and the Mediterranean Sea congenial to their needs.

With Rome in a panic after pirates sacked the Roman port at Ostia, burning down the port, destroying the consular fleet and killing two senators in 68 B.C., the next year Pompey Magnus was given a blank check by the controversial Lex Gabinia to wage war on piracy. It took him a mere three months to shock and awe the Mediterranean into submission with his fleet of 500 warships, defeating the Cilician pirates with a conclusive naval victory at Alanya. So he claimed, at any rate. There’s some debate as to whether the Cilician pirates really settled down to farm as he said they had or just went back to privateering on the seas only in a more circumspect fashion.

At that time the area was still independently held by Hellenistic rulers. By the first century A.D., though, Rome held sway over the entire region. Caligula gave Rough Cilicia to client king and personal friend Antiochus IV of Commagene in 38 A.D. He lost it for a bit then got it back courtesy of Claudius in 41 A.D. He held it for the next 31 years, and somewhere during that time he built the Roman city of Antiochia ad Cragum, possibly on the site of a previous Hellenistic town founded by Seleucid (meaning the Greek part of Alexander’s empire gobbled up after his death by his former general Seleucus) Emperor Antiochus IV Epiphanes.

~ Tangent time! ~

Antiochus IV Epiphanes is personally responsible for an idiom still very much in use today. In 170 B.C., he launched an attack on Ptolemaic Egypt. It was successful; he captured Ptolemy VI then reinstalled him on the throne to act as his puppet.

When Ptolemy VI and his brother Ptolemy VIII Euergetes agreed amongst themselves to be co-rulers, Antiochus was displeased. This was not the puppetry he was looking for. He launched a second attack on Egypt in 168 B.C., but when his armies were just about to reach Alexandria, he was met by a Roman consular delegation led by one Gaius Popillius Laenas.

I’ll let my homie Livy take it from here.

After crossing the river at Eleusis, about four miles from Alexandria, he was met by the Roman commissioners, to whom he gave a friendly greeting and held out his hand to Popilius. Popilius, however, placed in his hand the tablets on which was written the decree of the senate and told him first of all to read that. After reading it through he said he would call his friends into council and consider what he ought to do. Popilius, stern and imperious as ever, drew a circle round the king with the stick he was carrying and said, “Before you step out of that circle give me a reply to lay before the senate.” For a few moments he hesitated, astounded at such a peremptory order, and at last replied, “I will do what the senate thinks right.” Not till then did Popilius extend his hand to the king as to a friend and ally.

And that, boys and girls, is where the expression “to draw a line in the sand” comes from.

Antiochus IV Epiphanes is also responsible for Hannukah, since as ruler of a Judea in revolt against his deputies in 167 B.C. he sided with Hellenized Jews, made traditional Jewish worship illegal, killed a few tens of thousands of people and instigated the Maccabean revolt.

~ End Tangent ~

Antiochus IV of Commagene was finally deposed by Vespasian in 72 A.D. After that, Antiochia, Rough Cilicia and Cilicia as a whole became a directly governed province of Rome. There hasn’t been a great deal of archaeology in the region, but we do know that by the third century A.D., Antiochia had indeed become a prosperous exporter of agricultural goods and timber. The gigantic mosaic indicates that it was perhaps more than that, regionally significant in a way we hadn’t realized.

The field work is done for the season, but next year the UNL team will be back to uncover the second half of the mosaic. They plan to build a roof over it again to help protect it from the elements and keep it safe for future generations.

Here’s a video of archaeologist Michael Hoff talking about the discovery of the mosaic and its import:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E8FgKVR7ow&w=430]

Byron’s signed first edition of Frankenstein found

In a Romantic literature fan’s fantasy come true, Lord Byron’s personal copy of Frankenstein, inscribed to him by Mary Shelley, has been discovered in a private library and is going up for auction. It’s such an incredible confluence of iconic elements from the era, completely unique and so unlikely to have survived that it’s almost impossible to believe.

The story of how Frankenstein came to be would be legendary if it hadn’t actually happened. In May of 1816, poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, his lover and future wife Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin and her stepsister Claire Claremont rented a small house on Lake Geneva next to the Villa Diodati, the stately home where poet and rakehell Lord Byron was staying with his personal physician John William Polidori. They planned to spend the summer together enjoying the natural beauty of the area, but they were thwarted by a volcano.

Villa Diodati with Byron figure in foreground, engraving by Edward Finden, 1832The eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia in April of 1815 was the world’s largest since 180 A.D., and it drove so much ash into the air that famine, floods, massive rainfalls and other bizarre weather phenomena wreaked havoc all over the world the next year. Thus 1816 became known as “the year without a summer,” and our friends in Switzerland found their plans for lovely picnics, lakeside walks and boat rides ruined by the constant rain and unseasonably cold temperatures.

To pass the time, the company read each other ghost stories. According to Mary Shelley’s introduction to the third edition of Frankenstein, the first illustrated edition and the first one in which authorship was attributed to her rather than kept anonymous, Byron proposed that each of them write a ghost story of their own. All accepted the challenge. Percy Shelley wrote Fragment of a Ghost Story, Polidori wrote a story about a woman whose head is turned into a skull after she looks through a keyhole at something she had been prohibited from viewing, and Byron wrote the beginning of a vampire story which Polidori would later use as a jumping off point for his novel The Vampyre, initially erroneously published under Byron’s name. This was the first modern vampire novel, the foundation of the rich, ruthless, attractive blood-sucking immortal that still stalks our nights.

Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley by Richard Rothwell, 1840Mary, daunted by her own ambition to create a story that would be truly scary and rival the ones they had already read, couldn’t seem to muster up a good idea. One night, after listening to Byron and Shelley discuss Erasmus Darwin, galvanism and the reanimation of dead flesh, that good idea finally came to her.

My imagination, unbidden, possessed and guided me, gifting the successive images that arose in my mind with a vividness far beyond the usual bounds of reverie. I saw — with shut eyes, but acute mental vision, — I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world. His success would terrify the artist; he would rush away from his odious handywork, horror-stricken. He would hope that, left to itself, the slight spark of life which he had communicated would fade; that this thing, which had received such imperfect animation, would subside into dead matter; and he might sleep in the belief that the silence of the grave would quench for ever the transient existence of the hideous corpse which he had looked upon as the cradle of life. He sleeps; but he is awakened; he opens his eyes; behold the horrid thing stands at his bedside, opening his curtains, and looking on him with yellow, watery, but speculative eyes.

The creature awakens, frontispiece of third edition of "Frankenstein," the first one with illustration, first one with Mary Shelley named as authorI opened mine in terror. The idea so possessed my mind, that a thrill of fear ran through me, and I wished to exchange the ghastly image of my fancy for the realities around. I see them still; the very room, the dark parquet, the closed shutters, with the moonlight struggling through, and the sense I had that the glassy lake and white high Alps were beyond. I could not so easily get rid of my hideous phantom; still it haunted me. I must try to think of something else. I recurred to my ghost story, my tiresome unlucky ghost story! O! if I could only contrive one which would frighten my reader as I myself had been frightened that night!

Swift as light and as cheering was the idea that broke in upon me. “I have found it! What terrified me will terrify others; and I need only describe the spectre which had haunted my midnight pillow.” On the morrow I announced that I had thought of a story. I began that day with the words, It was on a dreary night of November, making only a transcript of the grim terrors of my waking dream.

The short story that resulted was so successful that Shelley encouraged her to expand it into a novel. When they returned to England in September, Mary was incubating a great classic of literature and Claire the illegitimate daughter of Lord Byron to whom she would give birth in January of 1817. Mary finished writing Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus in the summer and published a small first edition of 500 in January of 1818. The publishers gave her six presentation copies to give away; one of them she put aside to give to Byron, the man who had started it all.

Claire Clairmont by Amelia Curran, 1819After the birth of Alba, Claire had written incessantly to Byron, begging him to take them both in, reminding him of their passionate lovemaking and threatening suicide when he rejected her. These letters only alienated him further, and Byron had never exactly been smitten with her. The month his daughter was born he wrote this to a friend:

You know–& I believe saw once that odd-headed girl—who introduced herself to me shortly before I left England—but you do not know—that I found her with Shelley and her sister at Geneva—I never loved her nor pretended to love her—but a man is a man–& if a girl of eighteen comes prancing to you at all hours of the night—there is but one way—the suite of all this is that she was with child–& returned to England to assist in peopling that desolate island…This comes of “putting it about” (as Jackson calls it) & be dammed to it—and thus people come into the world.

Lord Byron by Thomas Philipps, 1814Yeah, Byron was not a nice guy when it came to women. The end-result of their ugly correspondence was that Bryon refused to have anything to do with his daughter unless she was sent to him without her mother. He would acknowledge her and take financial responsibility for her, but only on condition that Claire be nowhere near. He also demanded that her name be changed to Allegra, which it was.

In March, the Shelleys (now married after the horrible suicide of his first wife Harriet had made him a widower), Claire Claremont and Allegra left England for Italy. Claire felt that her daughter’s wealthy, titled father could provide advantages that she could not, so she agreed to Byron’s heartless condition. Shelley had some hope that he might be made to see reason. Their plan was to meet up with Byron, who was staying in Venice at the time, and work something out. In letter after letter Percy Shelley tried to persuade Byron that this forced separation would be unconscionably cruel to Claire and to the child, but he was unmovable. He would not accept their parent-trap invitation to go to their villa in Lake Como to pick up Allegra, nor would he allow Claire to accompany Allegra to Venice.

In the midst of this extra-legal custody battle (you can read some of it here; poor Shelley was stuck in the middle in the worst way), Mary Shelley’s hopes that she’d be able to give Byron his inscribed copy of Frankenstein in person faded. In the end Shelley shipped the three-volume first edition to Byron in a parcel along with some other books.

You will receive your packets of books. [Leigh] Hunt sends you one he has lately published; and I am commissioned by an old friend of yours to convey “Frankenstein” to you, and to request that if you conjecture the name of the author, that you will regard it as a secret. In fact, it is Mrs. S'[helley]s. It has met with considerable success in England ; but she bids me say, “That she would regard your approbation as a more flattering testimony of its merit.”

She signed it without signing it, writing “To Lord Byron from the author” in keeping with her desire for authorial anonymity.

Byron’s reply to Shelley, if there was one, has not survived, but his opinion of Frankenstein has. In May of 1819 Byron wrote to his publisher John Murray:

Mary Godwin (now Mrs. Shelley) wrote “Frankenstein”—which you have reviewed thinking it Shelley’s—methinks it is a wonderful work for a Girl of nineteen—not nineteen indeed—at that time

(That whole letter covers so many juicy details it’s amazing. He talks about receiving a proof of his epic poem Don Juan, crushes his old friend Hobhouse’s charge against it of “indelicacy,” denies that he wrote The Vampyre, confirms Polidori’s claim in the introduction that Shelley freaked out one night while they were telling ghost stories although he can’t confirm that it’s because he hallucinated that the women had eyes on their breasts, rebuts in strenuous terms Poet Laureate Robert Southey’s lurid accusations of an incestuous threesome between Byron, Mary and Claire, plus describes a stormy night in which Shelley, who could not swim, kept his calm when the boat seemed about to capsize and refused Byron’s offer to save him should the worst happen. In June of 1822, three years after that letter was written, Shelley drowned when his boat capsized in a storm off the coast of Liguria. Little Allegra, just five years old, died two months before him.)

After Byron’s death in 1824, his library was dispersed by John Murray whom Byron had appointed the executor of his estate. In January, 1825, Murray received five boxes of Byron’s books shipped to him from Greece, where Byron had died of fever while fighting for Greek independence. He gave many of them away to Byron’s friends, then held a public sale in July to sell the rest. We know the titles offered at that sale. This one was not listed among them.

Douglas Jay, Baron JayPerhaps Murray kept it. He could have given it away or he could have sold it privately. All we know for sure is that one volume of the three survived, the first volume with the remarkable anonymous inscription of its author, winding up in the library of Labour Member of Parliament Douglas Jay, Baron Jay. That’s where it was found almost two centuries later by his grandson when he was going through some of Lord Jay’s papers in 2011. Jay was a good friend of Jock Murray, direct descendant of John Murray, so it’s possible he received the book via his Murray connection. He was also an avid Byron collector, so he could have gotten the book through other contacts as well.

There is only one other surviving copy of Frankenstein inscribed by Mary Shelley. It’s an extremely important first edition from a literary perspective because it includes marginal notes, cross-outs and changes in her own hand that would be made to later editions. Mary gave this copy to an English friend of hers known only as Mrs. Thomas out of gratitude for her kindness to her after she was devastated by Shelley’s death in 1822. This copy is now in the Morgan Library in New York City.

As significant and touching as that version is, the Byron version may even top it. His connection to the foundation of the Frankenstein mythos, the references to it in some of Shelley’s and Byron’s most drama-crammed letters, puts the modest volume square in the center of the vortex of relationships that defined the Romantic era.

Frankenstein manuscript pageLord Byron’s copy of Frankenstein will be on display at rare bookseller Peter Harrington Books from September 26th to October 3rd. They are taking offers of no less than £350,000 (about $568,000), but of course the sky’s the limit on something this special. Let us all cross our fingers and toes that it ends up in a public institution like the Bodleian Library at Oxford which has a great many of Mary Shelley’s papers, including the original notebooks in which she wrote the first draft of Frankenstein with Percy Shelley’s edits.

The Bodleian Library has an excellent online exhibition of some of the highlights of its Shelley collection, including both of Mary’s Frankenstein notebooks that you can read page by page in a zoomable viewer. Here’s volume one, and here’s volume two.

3000-year-old mummy case restored with LEGO

LEGO support device with restored mummy case in the backgroundA 3000-year-old Egyptian mummy case which has been in the basement of Cambridge University’s Fitzwilliam Museum for almost 50 years has been restored to its former splendor using LEGO supports. Damage done in antiquity and deterioration since its discovery in the late 19th century had left the case cracking and caving in at the chest. Fitzwilliam conservators enlisted the aid of the university’s Department of Engineering to resolve the restoration challenges, and senior engineering student David Knowles enlisted the aid of LEGO.

This mummy case was discovered in the Ramesseum, a mortuary temple of Pharaoh Ramesses the Great in the Theban necropolis across the Nile from modern Luxor, by Egyptologist James Quibell in 1896. Thieves had ripped out the gilded wood face panel and the mummy was gone. What remained was a brightly painted cartonnage case dating to the Third Intermediate Period (1069–664 B.C.).

Cartonnage is an Egyptian technique of layering strips of linen or papyrus with plaster or gum to make a thin, stable surface that can be easily shaped when wet and easily painted once dry. During the Third Intermediate Period, this technique was used to create mummy cases moulded to a mummy-shaped core which would be replaced with the real mummy once the case hardened. The cartonnage case would then be used as the innermost coffin inside a larger sarcophagus. The painting on the Fitzwilliam’s case featured scenes from the Egyptian Book of the Dead in an unusual dark blue/green color scheme and identified its former owner as Hor.

Damaged 3000-year-old Egyptian mummy caseThe museum has been studying the Hor cartonnage case for years in the attempt to stabilize the piece sufficiently so it can be put back on display. In its early years at the museum, the case had unfortunately been exposed to excessive humidity, and as a result the torn perimeter around the looted face mask and the pectoral area had caved in. That put pressure on the rest of the case, causing long cracks in the cartonnage which threatened the entire structure as well as the surface painting.

Conservators knew they could de-stave the chest and face by softening the cartonnage with water and reshaping it, but they couldn’t wet the entire case since it could easily just collapse into itself, and even in small amounts the water could have damaged the painted surfaces they were trying to stabilize. They needed to have access to the case from the back through to the inside in order to keep the outer painted surface safe while they moistened the cartonnage in small sections and reshaped it at a snail’s pace. How to position the mummy case face downward in a safe, stable way that wouldn’t run the risk of worsening the structural problems and damaging the painting?

That was the conundrum they presented to the Department of Engineering, and the department opened the question as a final project for its seniors.

Hor cartonnage case suspended upside-down in the frameThe challenge was taken up by David Knowles. In close consultation with the Fitzwilliam, David devised and made a frame to suspend Hor face-down while the reshaping was carried out. Using a combination of traditional wooden frames and mouldable materials designed for medical use, Hor could be completely supported for weeks at a time, allowing conservator Sophie Rowe to reshape the cartonnage very gradually.

The work wasn’t over yet. The case of Hor couldn’t be put on display in its ingenious but not visitor-friendly restoration frame and bandages. David Knowles got to work this time creating a display mount that would provide the proper support for the cartonnage case to rest on its back for people to see it. Once the display mount was done, he still needed to find a way to ensure that the chest wouldn’t collapse again just courtesy of gravity. Some kind of internal support that was firm enough to keep the chest in position but light enough not to put an additional weight and pressure burden on the structure was necessary.

LEGO support inside the cartonnage mummy caseThat’s when David had the brilliant idea of using LEGO. He built six lightweight, flexible LEGO lifts with an A-frame base, a central column of adjustable height and a top square of adjustable angle. All you need to change their height and angles is to screw them into position. To ensure the pointy angles of top and bottom don’t harm the cartonnage, conservators padded them with archival foam wherever they are in contact with it.

For this elegant and adorable solution, David Knowles won a well-earned prize from the engineering department. You can see the LEGO devices in movement in this video news story.

Restored coffin