The Egyptian parliament is about to pass a law that would require any replicas of ancient Egyptian artifacts and monuments to pay royalties for the use of the design.
Mr Hawass said the law would apply to full-scale replicas of any object in any museum in Egypt.
“Commercial use” of ancient monuments like the pyramids or the sphinx would also be controlled, he said.
“Even if it is for private use, they must have permission from the Egyptian government,” he added.
But he said the law would not stop local and international artists reproducing monuments as long as they were not exact replicas.
Sadly, that means the Luxor in Vegas would be exempt because it’s tarted up far beyond the point of replica (and good taste, of course).
EDIT: More analysis of the practicalities here.
Can they do this? I haven’t seen much discussion of the legality or enforceability of this copyright.
They can pass any law they want, I suppose. I don’t see that it’s remotely enforceable internationally. The illegal replicators will just have to be sure to avoid going to Egypt.
From the follow-up article:
I dunno. Of course a nation has the right to “defend” these things — in print, or by otherwise correcting the record. But charging intellectual property fees? I think somebody got a little thought balloon with “EASY MONEY!” inside it, and we’re looking at the result.
I think you’re probably right, although I don’t think the “easy money” idea went much further than the having of it. It’s unenforceable, and even if it could be enforced, all anybody would have to do is alter the replica — even just the scale — to be exempt from fees.
I can’t help but suspect pure Hawass publicity stunt. He’s into that sort of “respect mah ancient properteh!1” grandstanding.
I suspect your suspicion is correct.
I also suspect you’re awesome.
Ha ha! Your automated no-further-nesting message has a grammatical error. The demonstration of your omnipotent ability to defy the message only underscores your powerlessness to correct it!
The paradox. It burns!
MY OMNIPOTENCE PWNS YET AGAIN
:notworthy:
I’m very law abiding. I’ll be happy to pay a royalty fee to the original artist of anything I decide to copy, providing he can still prove that he still holds the original copyright.
Otherwise, I’ll buy a hot fudge sundae with the money.
A highly ethical stance, although it would be more so if the sundae were caramel.
Ummm…delete the first “still”…she said out of the depths of compulsivity.
😆 I have nothing but respect for so compelling a compulsion.
:boogie: I went to school to nuns.
Caramel is good, too. Hot fudge has a slight lead, with me, but I’m not fussy.
Except, maybe, for kiwi.