Christie’s tries to sell stolen Nimrud earrings

Allegedly, at least. The former director of the Iraq Museum, Donny George, is absolutely convinced the 3,000 year old Neo-Assyrian gold earrings came from the excavation of Nimrud which he personally witnessed.

The treasures of Nimrud, considered one of the most spectacular finds of the 20th century and compared with the treasures of King Tut’s tomb, include eight pairs of seemingly identical earrings. Of the thousands of archaeological sites in Iraq, the ancient capital of the Assyrian Empire was one of the richest.

The highlight was the intricate gold jewelry, using techniques not seen again for thousands of years. [...]

After the fall of Baghdad in 2003 and the subsequent looting of the Iraq Museum, US investigators and Iraqi officials tracked down the treasures of Nimrud to a vault within a vault in the basement of Iraq’s burned and flooded central bank.

Christie’s claims in the catalogue that they are “similar” to a pair found at Nimrud, but that the previous owner acquired them in 1969, a convenient date indeed given that the UNESCO convention on illegal antiquities — the standard cutoff for questionably-sourced artifacts — was enacted in 1970.

Donny George knows of no “similar” finds outside of the Nimrud pieces. That’s what made them so special: the quality was astonishing and entirely unique.

As of yesterday, the earrings were still listed on Christie’s site. Iraqi officials have petitioned to halt the sale, but the auction is next week so they don’t have much time.

Edit: Looks the CSM story got results. Christie’s withdrew the lot this morning. :boogie:

Share

RSS feed

7 Comments »

Comment by Hans
2008-12-05 10:24:36

And now to find the other stolen pieces and return them. The workmanship of these earrings is beautiful though isn’t it?

Comment by livius drusus
2008-12-05 10:46:56

Yes indeed. When you compare it to that lovely Roman-era earring recently found in Jerusalem, the goldsmithing is amazingly advanced. These earrings were made a thousand years or so earlier!

 
 
Comment by Hans
2008-12-05 15:20:07

That’s exactly what I was thinking too. I’d sure like to have had a better photo of the Nimrud earrings. For the antiquity of those you just have to marvel at the workmanship. And noone but the highest status would have had those so I can’t help but agree they very well could have belonged to a Queen.

Comment by livius drusus
2008-12-06 13:56:23

This page has some big pictures of Nimrud gold pieces. Check out the necklace and the queen’s headdress.

 
 
Comment by Legsy
2008-12-25 16:43:59

I love the earrings, they are timeless could be worn today.

Comment by livius drusus
2009-01-01 10:49:30

Gladly. By me. :yes:

 
 
Comment by Jason
2008-12-26 17:51:50

Hi there,

I like your blog, its very helpful. I was wondering if you wanted to exchange links. If yes, you can find my information below. Be sure to send me your information so we can properly swap links. Thank you and Happy Holidays!

Paranormal Knowledge
http://www.paranormalknowledge.com

Sincerely,
Jason
President, Paranormalknowledge.com

 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.