Roman Republic coins found in wall

Excavations in Murviel-lès-Montpellier in the Occitanie region of southern France have unearthed the remains of a large building with a pot of Roman Republic coins secreted in one of its walls.

Initially founded in the beginning of the 2nd century B.C. by the Samnagenses, a Gallic people mentioned in Pliny the Elder’s Natural History, the oppidum of Altimurium was a fortified settlement was built on a hill that would later become known as Castellas. At its height, the town covered almost 30 hectares encircled by a monumental wall. It was divided into an upper town on the flat summit and several terraces below, and the lower town on the gentle slope at the bottom of the hill. Where the upper and lower town met was a large forum with two porticos and colonnaded public buildings.

The ancient town was absorbed into the territory of its much larger neighbor, the Roman colony of Nemausus, modern-day Nîmes, in the 2nd century, and thereafter suffered a rapid decline. The oppidum was abandoned by the middle of the 3rd century and was never rebuilt. The current town of Murviel-lès-Montpellier was founded in the 11th century on a hill to the south of Castellas.

This season’s excavations focused on the lower town enclosure dating to around 100 B.C. in advance of planned home construction in the area. They found the first defensive ditch ever discovered at the site and the only evidence of a road in the lower town. They also found a medieval burial ground, but most notably a building of yet undetermined function built in the 1st century B.C.

The remains consist of a large threshold stone and carefully constructed walls with some traces of surviving plaster. A bench was built into the wall adjacent to the threshold. A second room featured a concrete floor. This structure was extensively redeveloped in the early 1st century A.D., creating a large building with three wings built around a central courtyard. A dolium, a large storage amphora, was found embedded in a basin in a room that had been used one time (and only one time) as a forge. A room in the south wing was employed as a forge, not just once but consistently. Two hearths and large quantities of associated detritus were found. The design of the building and the evidence of different types of work having taken place within its walls indicate this was not a dwelling. A large open space in front of it suggests the building may have been open to the public.

A small pottery vessel containing 20 silver denarii of the Roman Republic was unearthed in the demolition layers of this building. Archaeologists believe it may have been hidden in the earthen walls of the room that were destroyed during the reconstruction. The coin hoard survived by a fluke.

Share

RSS feed

4 Comments »

Comment by Douglas Smith
2021-08-13 19:11:27

The coin of Tiberius alone places the burial not before 14 AD so calling the coins Republican is an error. The other coin is of Mark Antony and circulated in quantity into the 2nd century AD. Are these pictures from this site or just stock photos?

 
Comment by Frida
2021-08-14 00:32:47

I am no expert on coins, but their whole appearance seems to be cruder. However, I would agree that closeup photos of those cleaned coins would help.

Where, in the first place, do you see “Tiberius” and the other one? – Personally, I don’t :no:

 
Comment by Richard Lonne
2021-08-14 09:32:00

Frida, you said “I am no expert on coins…”. Doug Smith is an expert on coins – that’s how he can identify examples like these.

One of the coins has distinct signs of a very common Marc Antony legionary coin, and the other also has clear (if hard to distinguish) signs of a Tiberius coin.
Even with the Marc Antony coin being minted in the first century BC, it was still circulating centuries afterward, so that can’t be used to date this group of coins. The Tiberius coin marks 14 AD (the year his reign began) as the very earliest possible date of this coin group.

 
Comment by Frida
2021-08-14 11:28:06

Fair enough, Richard and all the real experts, if it is indeed one of his coins, then 14AD would of course –even to me– make sense.

Therefore, it would be great to post cleaner more detailed pictures of other specimen, and to know, what those mysterious “distinct signs” would be.

Myself, being no expert, I hardly see anything at all on there. Usually, I would expect that “Tiberius” is simply written on there (or “Tib”).

———–
PS: Have, for example, a look at the coins from Trier. There are indeed “distinct names” on them.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI