A Roman gold earring discovered by a metal detectorist in Burston, Norfolk, last Christmas Eve, has been declared treasure and will go on display at the Diss Museum, an award-winning local museum occupying two former historic butcher shops in Norfolk. This small gold disc weighing a total 2.2 grams is also helping archaeologists redefine earlier such discoveries.

When Nick Bateman first unearthed the earring in a field, he thought it was an old bottle cap. When he cleaned it a little he saw that it was gold and definitely not a bottle cap. He reported it to the authorities and the piece was examined by a coin expert from the Norfolk Historic Environment Service.

The earring is circular, 20.5 mm (.8 inches) in diameter and was formed by two gold sheets of different thicknesses soldered together. Both sides are decorated with a relief in repoussé technique (pushed out from the back) of what appears to be an eagle on a ground line formed of six dots on top of a downward-pointing crescent. The eagle is encircled by a wreath and a cross is visible between the points of the crescent on one side of the earring. It is no longer visible on the other side, but must have been there originally as the decoration is the same on both sides.

There is a d-shaped projection with a perforation, but it is not at the top of the pendant. It is at the bottom, a suspension loop for a secondary pendant hanging from the gold disc. Part of the top side of the earring is missing. This damaged area must have been perforated or otherwise contained the mount which would have hung from the ear.

There are no exact matches for this design on the archaeological record. A similar gold disc formed by two thin gold sheets joined together and decorated with a repoussé relief is the closest cognate. It too was found in Norfolk and it was crumpled, but it has no pendant loop and the decoration is so hard to make out that it was categorized as an unknown with a few superficial features in common with Anglo-Saxon bracteate pendants. The discovery of the earring has now resulted in its unknown cousin being dated to the Roman period (43-409 A.D.), and similar finds are also being reevaluated in the wake of the Burston piece.

“A colleague thought it was medieval as he could see a tiny cross under one of the loops,” [numismatist Adrian Marsden] said.

“But when I looked closely I could see a laurel wreath and an eagle and that’s exactly the sort of thing you get on Roman objects.

“Other artefacts like this had gone down as medieval, so it does show you need to keep your wits about you when you examine these things.”

Metallurgical analysis of tin ingots found on a fabulously wealthy Late Bronze Age (ca. 1320 B.C.) shipwreck found off the coast of Uluburun, Turkey, has revealed that a full third of the tin was sourced from a remote shepherding region in Uzbekistan, more than 2,000 miles away from Haifa where the ship set sail. That means small pastoralist communities in the Central Asian highlands also ran local mining operations that connected to vast international trade networks linking Bronze Age Europe, Africa and the Near East.

The shipwreck was discovered in 1982 by a sponge diver plying his trade in the Mediterranean waters off Uluburun. He spotted oxhide ingots (rectangular in shape with four handles in the corner that give them the appearance of a hide) and reported them as “metal biscuits with ears,” a description as charming as it is accurate. Institute of Nautical Archaeology divers confirmed the find and dated the wreck to the Late Bronze Age.

Resting on a slope between 140 and 170 feet below the surface, the wreck posed a significant challenge to excavate. Dives were limited to 20 minutes at a time during a three-month season. It took eleven consecutive diving campaigns from 1984 until 1994 for a total of 22,413 individual dives to explore the wreck and recover the cargo. The final tally was a jaw-dropping 17 tons of cargo, more than 18,000 artifacts from luxury finished goods for the elitest of the elite to stone tools to raw materials. It is one of the largest and wealthiest Bronze Age assemblages ever found and was sourced from 11 different civilizations including the Egyptian, Canaanite, Syrian, Nubian and Mycenaean cultures.

The bulk of the cargo consisted of copper and tin ingots in a ratio of 10:1, the exact proportion needed to smelt bronze, and an enormous quantity of it. This one ship was carrying enough copper and tin to make 5,000 swords.

A brief non-comprehensive summary of its contents:

• 10 tons of Cypriot copper in 354 slab ingots, 317 of them in the usual oxhide shape, 31 in a similar form but with only two protrusions on the long side (a shape unique to the Uluburun ship), 121 cake or bun-shaped ingots.
• One ton of tin in oxhide and bun ingots.
• 149 Canaanite amphorae filled with, among other things, many colors of glass beads, olives and terebinth resin (a fragrant oil burned as incense). This is the largest deposit of ancient terebinth ever found.
• 175 flat, circular glass ingots in cobalt blue, turquoise, amber and lavender (NB: before glass blowing was invented, glass was made by melting ingots and pouring the liquid glass into molds.)
  Raw ivory (elephant tusks, 14 hippopotamus teeth)
• 18 African blackwood logs, so highly favored by the Egyptian elite for their furniture and wood accessory needs that their word for it “hbny” has come down to us 3,500 years later as the English “ebony.”
• Thousands of murex (sea snails from which the famed Tyrian purple dye was derived) shells.
• Large ceramic storage jars (pithoi), some packed with Cypriot pottery (oil lamps, jugs, bowls) made for export, others with fruits and other foodstuffs including olive oil, almonds, pine nuts, figs, grapes, pomegranates, olives and spices like coriander, nigella and safflower.
• One large gold chalice weighing 236 grams.
• A small gold scarab inscribed with the name of Nefertiti, queen consort of Pharaoh Ahkenaten. This is the only gold scarab of Nefertiti ever discovered.

The cargo recovered from Uluburun is part of the permanent collection of the Bodrum Museum of Underwater Archaeology where it is displayed in a reconstruction of the wreck. The assemblage is a unique and invaluable source of information about Late Bronze Age trade, industry, economics and technology, even how hulls of merchant ships were packed for their long voyages. Analyses of the Uluburun materials continue to this day.

One of the questions researchers have long sought to answer is the source of the tin. Tin is scarce in the Mediterranean, and you can’t make bronze without it, so how were these giant Bronze Age empires and kingdoms supplying the high demand for so scarce a material? Up until recently, metallurgical analysis has not been able to pinpoint the source of Bronze Age tin. Thanks to decades of data collection on the composition of tin ore from different locations around the world, scientists were able to use isotope analysis to narrow down the origin of the Uluburun ingots: one third of it came from the Mušiston mine in Uzbekistan, two thirds from the Kestel mine in ancient Anatolia. Kestel was under the control of the Hittite Empire in the Late Bronze Age, a powerful centralized state that could afford and arrange major mining and transport operations. Uzbeki shepherds had no such resources.

[The research team’s] findings unveiled a shockingly complex supply chain that involved multiple steps to get the tin from the small mining community to the Mediterranean marketplace.

“It appears these local miners had access to vast international networks and—through overland trade and other forms of connectivity—were able to pass this all-important commodity all the way to the Mediterranean,” [Michael Frachetti, professor of archaeology in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis] said.

“It’s quite amazing to learn that a culturally diverse, multiregional and multivector system of trade underpinned Eurasian tin exchange during the Late Bronze Age.”

Adding to the mystique is the fact that the mining industry appears to have been run by small-scale local communities or free laborers who negotiated this marketplace outside of the control of kings, emperors or other political organizations, Frachetti said.

“To put it into perspective, this would be the trade equivalent of the entire United States sourcing its energy needs from small backyard oil rigs in central Kansas,” he said.

The study has been published in the journal Science Advances and can be read in its entirety here.

Two Late Bronze Age (1300–700 B.C.) metal hoards were discovered buried one on top of the other in the village of Kaliska, Poland. The largest of the two is one of the largest and most varied Bronze Age assemblages ever found in Pomerania, and that is saying something because more than 320 Bronze Age and Early Iron Age hoards have been unearthed there.

The details of both discoveries are murky because the finders illegally excavated the artifacts and then did their damnedest to deliberately obscure the facts of discovery and avoid surrendering the loot to cultural heritage authorities. The find first came to light in spring of 2017 when metal detectorists posted pictures of a large number of Bronze Age artifacts on a website. Authorities were alerted to the postings and pursued the finders who dodged them repeatedly. They also inaccurately reported where they had found the treasure. Eleven objects from the hoard were finally recovered in a police raid in June. The rest were handed over to a local museum in July.

Later that year, word got out that a second hoard had been found in the same location. It too was a Late Bronze Age metal hoard, containing horse harness fittings, weapons, armor accessories and metal vessels, much of them copper. The landowner discovered the hoard under a boulder, dug it up, took it home and hid it. He was finally caught out that fall and the hoard confiscated. Three of the metal detectorists would later be convicted of illegally digging up an archaeological monuments. The landowner was also convicted of heritage crimes.

From what police and archaeologists have been able to piece together, the two discoveries were made back-to-back. First the farmer moved the boulder and found what would be dubbed Kaliska II, and then the metal detectorists snuck in after him, scanned the trench and found Kaliska I beneath it.

Kaliska I consists of 124 artifacts, most of them bronze objects including vessels, collars, bracelets and buttons. Inside one of the vessels were organic artifacts — leather straps, wood elements — that survived in fragmentary condition thanks to the amateurish, ignorant and hasty excavation by the looters. Of particular note are a large, sheet-bronze vessels, three Nordic cast bronze vessels, four collars made from sickle-shaped rings, six crescent-shaped collars, 13 necklaces, five plate brooches, three dress clasps, five phalerae (disk-shaped horse harness decorations) 43 bracelets, seven of them kidney bracelets (oval bracelets worn on the arms that feature a kidney-shaped knob in the center). The quantity and nature of its contents makes Kaliska I unique in comparison to other Late Bronze Age hoards unearthed in Pomerania.

The style of the metalwork suggests the bronze artifacts date to the Bronze Age Period V (ca. 950–800/750 B.C.), but there is evidence that some of the objects were in use a little after that. Archaeologists estimate the hoard was probably buried in the second half of Period V (ca. 875–780/750 B.C.). The surviving organic elements provided a rare opportunity to get an absolute date for the hoard. The radiocarbon analysis results date the deposit of the Kaliska I hoard to between 790 and 740 B.C.