At long last, a study of brain injuries in Asterix books

I’m sure we can all agree that it’s high time brain surgeons stopped screwing around and finally dedicated their time to worthy pursuits, namely a thorough investigation of the causes, nature and ethnic breakdown of traumatic brain injuries in Asterix books. A team of researchers from the Department for Neurosurgery of Heinrich-Heine-University in Düsseldorf, Germany have published the results of their study in Acta Neurochirurgica: The European Journal of Neurosurgery. The full clinical article is available for subscribers (or regular people like me who happen to know one) here.

Out of the 34 total Asterix books, the research team identified 704 traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). The injuries were assessed according to their severity using the Glasgow coma scale to rate a variety of post-trauma symptoms like subgaleal swelling, aka large bruised bumps on the noggin, periorbital ecchymoses, aka “raccoon eyes,” and paresis of the hypoglossal nerve, aka an outstretched tongue sticking out the side of the mouth. I could find no cool neurological term for tweeting birds and circling stars, however, which was a disappointment.

Among the 704 identified cases of brain injury, the largest group was composed of Romans (n=450, 63.9%, Fig. 1a, Table 1). Thereof, most characters were members of the Roman imperial army (n=414), as troopers (n=365; 88.2%) or commissioned officers (n=49; 11.8%). Furthermore, 120 cases of head-injured Gaulish citizens were identified, as well as 21 head-injured pirates. The remaining head-injury victims had various sociocultural backgrounds, in that they were Belgians, Britons, Egyptians, Indians, native Americans, Normans, Swiss or Vikings (summarized in Fig. 1b). Also, four extraterrestrial characters suffered from TBI.

Not surprisingly, Gauls caused the vast majority of TBI (n=614, 87.1%). Alone, Asterix and Obelix were responsible for more than half of the detected TBIs (n=406, 57.6%). In contrast, 32 head injuries (4.5%) were caused by Romans and only one by a pirate.

Protective helmets were worn in most instances of traumatic brain injury (70.5%), understandable given the preponderance of armored Romans getting whupped, but were of dubious effectiveness since they often flew off the victims’ heads during a thumping. Out of 497 cases of brain injury sustained while wearing a helmet, the protective gear was lost in 436 of them. That’s an 87.7% helmet loss rate. Interestingly, the loss of the helmet did result in more cases of tongue-sticking-out, but not in more instances of giant goose eggs.

Then there’s the matter of the doping agent. A performance enhancing drug known as “magic potion” was a significant factor in the severity of the brain injuries. Doubtless its exclusive use by the Gauls, in particular Asterix and Obelix, the latter of whom fell into a cauldron of said doping agent when he was a baby, is a major contributor to the preponderance of Roman victims. The “magic potion” also has a secondary usage as a curative. When administered after a traumatic brain injury, the victim is instantly healed.

The good news is through all this devastation of the poor, underpowered Romans and other antis, none of the traumatic brain injuries in Asterix books have ever resulted in death or even long-term impairment. The researchers point out that this highly favorable outcome is remarkable given the limited therapeutic tools in 50 B.C.

Share

RSS feed

9 Comments »

Comment by Edward Goldberg
2011-06-18 02:30:21

Thanks, LD! I would otherwise have missed this weird and wonderful contribution to the scientific literature, being one of those benighted people without even indirect access to the “The European Journal of Neurosurgery”.

It just goes to show… If this article appeared in an American journal, some right-winger would already have spouted fire on Capitol Hill, insisting that all funding be withdrawn from all historical research of every kind.

Since “The European Journal of Neurosurgery” is (presumably) peer reviewed, I would love to see the readers’ reports on this article!

 
Comment by livius drusus
2011-06-18 02:58:07

I would otherwise have missed this weird and wonderful contribution to the scientific literature, being one of those benighted people without even indirect access to the “The European Journal of Neurosurgery”.

Ah, that’s where you’re wrong. You know a gal who knows a guy. Check your email. ;)

Since “The European Journal of Neurosurgery” is (presumably) peer reviewed, I would love to see the readers’ reports on this article!

I’m afraid there aren’t any included with the pdf of the article itself. You might have to get your mitts on a hard copy of the journal itself for that.

 
Comment by Edward Goldberg
2011-06-18 07:31:28

Thanks, Liv! I feel so…CONNECTED! Actually, I was delighted to see that the authors present their “findings” with a wink and a nudge – which is heartening, since “the lighter side of brain damage” seems to be the story of my own life. HOWEVER, they never quite say, “Now Kiddies! Don’t forget your bicycle helmets when you head out to buy bubble gum and baseball cards. You are neither an Unidentified Roman Legionnaire nor the Road Runner.” Not that there are many “kiddies” reading the Acta Neurochirurgica. But these days, you never know…

 
Comment by Mr. Murphy in VA
2011-06-18 16:32:14

Have they done any research into the historical accuracy of the uniforms? And, shouldn’t the speech bubbles be in Latin and other olde-time languages? Are there any citations on that stuff, either? Just checking.

 
Comment by Grrrr
2011-06-18 23:57:21

Extra terrestrials!? :eek:

 
Comment by livius drusus
2011-06-19 00:32:22

Have they done any research into the historical accuracy of the uniforms? And, shouldn’t the speech bubbles be in Latin and other olde-time languages? Are there any citations on that stuff, either? Just checking.

Well no, because they’re neurosurgeons, not historians. ;)

 
Comment by livius drusus
2011-06-19 00:33:28

Extra terrestrials!? :eek:

I’m guessing that’s from the sadly degraded post-Goscinny period. I don’t own any of those, thankfully.

 
Comment by Mr. Murphy in VA
2011-06-19 17:59:38

Well, maybe someone should wrangle up a few historians and get them cracking on this. If I had the time, expertise and wherewithal –well, I’m sure it would be tough to compete with neurosurgeons for attention on the Internet. I’ll just confine myself to writing stupid comments, huh?

 
Comment by Saravanan
2011-07-31 07:51:52

A good article on the study of Brain Injuries. Will visit again. Thanks. Saravanan

 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.