Charlemagne’s bones found in his coffin

That may seem obvious, but given how often he was exhumed and reburied and parts of him given away as relics, it’s actually quite notable that the collection of bones in the Karlsschrein, the Shrine of Charlemagne, and other reliquaries in the Aachen Cathedral all appear to come from the same person who matches contemporary descriptions of the Frankish king.

Charlemagne died almost exactly 1200 years ago, on January 28th, 814, and was buried in the choir of the Palatine Chapel in Aachen Cathedral. (See Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne, written 15-20 years after his death for a description.) In 1000, Otto III, keen to present himself as the successor of the great man, had the burial vault opened. According to German chronicler and bishop Thietmar of Merseburg who was a contemporary of Otto’s, when the vault was opened they found Charlemagne’s uncorrupt body seated upon a marble throne wearing a crown with a scepter in his hand and the gospels open in his lap. Otto reportedly Helped himself to some of the relics and brought them to Rome.

Frederick I Barbarossa was the next to disinter Charlemagne. In 1165, he had the remains exhumed and displayed as holy relics at the Aachen Court festival. Again this was a means for Frederick to establish a connection with the revered leader and to position Aachen as a center of pilgrimage like St. Denis or Westminster. To curry favor with Frederick, Antipope Paschal III canonized Charlemagne that same year, although this, like all of Paschal’s acts, was never recognized by the Vatican. Barbarossa had Charlemagne’s remains reburied, this time in an elaborate third century A.D. Roman marble sarcophagus depicting the Rape of Persephone, which may seem incongruous as a topic for Christian burial, but like many ancient myths was re-interpreted as a symbol of Christ’s resurrection.

He didn’t stay there for long. In 1215, Frederick II had Charlemagne exhumed yet again. He commissioned local goldsmiths to make a rich gold casket to hold the bones. That’s the Karlsschrein originally in the placed in the center of the Palatine Chapel underneath a chandelier donated by Frederick Barbarossa in 1168.

Nearly 200 years passed before the next king inserted himself into Charlemagne’s eternal rest. In 1349, some of his bones were removed to individual reliquaries by Holy Roman Emperor Charles IV. He had a gold reliquary made to contain a thigh bone, and the Bust of Charlemagne to contain the skullcap. Louis XI of France contributed to the trend in 1481 by commissioning the Arm Reliquary, a golden arm that contains the ulna and radius from Charlemagne’s right arm.

It was scientists who took over from the emperors and kings. In 1861, Charlemagne’s remains were exhumed again so they could be studied. His skeleton was reconstructed and a very generous estimate (1.92 meters, or 6’4″) made of his height. In 1988, scientists exhumed his remains one more time, this time in secret. This study covered the bones in the reliquaries as well, a total of 94 bones and bone fragments, and they spent years meticulously examining and testing the collection. On Wednesday, January 28th, the 1200th anniversary of Charlemagne’s death, the results of the research were announced.

One of the scientists studying the remains, Professor Frank Rühli, said: “Thanks to the results from 1988 up until today, we can say with great likelihood that we are dealing with the skeleton of Charlemagne.”

From studying the dimensions of the upper arm, thigh and shin bones, scientists have built up a picture of the man behind the skeleton, and it matches descriptions of Charlemagne.

At 1.84 metres (six feet), he was unusually tall for his time. The team also estimated his weight at around 78 kilograms, giving him a slim body mass index of around 23.

The average height for an adult male in the 9th century was 1.69 meters or 5’6″, which put Charlemagne in the 99th percentile. Einhard’s description of him fits the results of the study even in some of the smaller details, like the limp that struck him in his later years. Researchers found that the kneecap and heel bone had deposits consistent with an injury.

From Chapter 22 of the Life of Charlemagne:

Charles was large and strong, and of lofty stature, though not disproportionately tall (his height is well known to have been seven times the length of his foot); the upper part of his head was round, his eyes very large and animated, nose a little long, hair fair, and face laughing and merry. Thus his appearance was always stately and dignified, whether he was standing or sitting; although his neck was thick and somewhat short, and his belly rather prominent; but the symmetry of the rest of his body concealed these defects. His gait was firm, his whole carriage manly, and his voice clear, but not so strong as his size led one to expect. His health was excellent, except during the four years preceding his death, when he was subject to frequent fevers; at the last he even limped a little with one foot.

Share

RSS feed

15 Comments »

Comment by Mary O’Murphy
2014-02-01 12:17:47

Was it ever doubted that these bones were genuine ? As well as Karl’s coffin(s), the Carolingian Octagon and the Chandelier are indeed remarkable. In 1520, Albrecht Durer was there, and he wrote:

‘At Aachen I saw the well- proportioned pillars with their good capitals of green and red porphyry and granite which Carolus [the one who died 1200y ago] had brought from Rome and set up there. These are made truly according to Vitruvius’s writings. [...] On the 23rd day of October [1520] King Charles [Charles V.] was crowned [Emperor] at Aachen; there I saw all manner of lordly splendour, the like of which those who live in our parts have never seen–all, as it has been described.’

 
Comment by Cordate
2014-02-01 18:23:23

Surprising to see them offering a weight estimate, given the lack of soft tissues.

 
Comment by Lapinbizarre/Roger Mortimer
2014-02-02 20:17:52

The 1520 coronation of Charles V was as “king of the Romans”, the title traditionally awarded on election. Until his reign, the title “Holy Roman Emperor” was awarded only to those rulers whose election was confirmed by coronation by the pope. Charles, who was crowned at Bologna by Clement VII in February, 1530, was the last emperor crowned in this tradition. His successors, all but one Habsburgs or members of the house of Habsburg-Lorraine, assumed the imperial title on election.

 
Comment by Mary
2014-02-03 01:23:50

Hi Roger, good the to know about the official investiture of the ‘king of the Romans’ as HRR Emperor. However, hasn’t been the ‘pope’ also been the ‘bishop of Rome’ (in theory) ever since ?

 
Comment by anja
2014-02-05 01:25:00

The churches should give the bones back. Thieves. :skull:

 
Comment by Terry Collmann
2014-02-08 10:17:47

Any news on any DNA studies?

 
Comment by Ruggero
2014-10-19 02:35:53

I’m sure that his DNA has already been examined. Whether they are going to tell you that is different question. Making famous people’s genomes publicly available would raise some issues, I suppose.
What would you do if you found out that you are one of Charlemagne’s descendent?
Some people would surely make odd requests, like claiming rights, goods, land or money that belonged to him.

 
Comment by David leach
2014-10-20 16:30:02

We in Europe are all related to him.

 
Comment by Bill Foreman
2015-01-01 22:43:31

We in the United States, by virtue of being genetic Europeans, are too. King Edward I Plantagenet is my 25th great grandfather twice over, for example.

 
Comment by Anonymous
2015-02-04 15:14:13

What does “twice over” mean?

 
Comment by Tom Green
2015-02-04 15:36:22

Charlemagne is my 35th GGF through Louis I. And my 33rd GGF through Bernard, King of Italy.

 
Comment by Anonymous
2015-02-27 16:17:43

it means on both sides aka inbreeding ;) :lol:

 
Comment by Anonymous
2015-02-27 16:59:52

review to the end ok:
Dont get too exited about Charlemagne in your blood line. http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/…/charlemagnes-dna…/

this is probably why: HIS many Children:

Alpais Armoudru van Parijs (geboren der Franken),

Adaltrudis van Karolingen der Franken,

Karel de Jongere KONING van Neustrië,

Adelais van Karolingen der Franken,

Pepijn I. de Gebochelde Karloman KONING van Italië / van Karolingen der Franken,

Rortrude Hrotrudis van Karolingen der Franken,

Lodewijk I. de Vrome Keizer van het Romijnse Rijk van Karolingen der Franken,

Lotharius der Franken,

Bertha Prinses van Ponthieu (geboren der Franken van Karolingen),

Bertha van Karolingen der Franken,

Gisela van Karolingen der Franken,

Hildegarde van Karolingen der Franken,

Drogo Dreux Bisschop van Metz Prins der Franken (Bastaardkind van Karel de Grote),

Hugo de Abt van St Quentin de Châtillon Prins der Franken (Bastaardkind van Karel de Grote)
this is 14, but there are surely more as guessed below.

Charlemagne’s Family
In his personal life, Charlemagne had multiple wives and mistresses and perhaps as many as 18 children.

each generation is average of 30 years, that is 2015 minus 772 (in his case) = 1243 years divided by 30 that makes 41 generations from then to now.
If on average all his 18 kids had only 2 kids,
that is 36 grand kids in generation 2 (right)
72 gen 3
144 gen4
288 gen5
576 gen6
1152 gen7
2304 gen8
4608 gen9
9216 gen10 (remember there are 41 generations total) (still there?)
18,432 gen11
36,864 gen12
73,728 gen13
14,456 gen14
294,912 gen15
589,824 gen16
1,179,648 gen17
million mark and we’re not even halfway!
2,359,296 gen18
4,718,592 gen19
9,437,184 gen20 halfway there, at around the year 1400…
with 21 generations LEFT to 2015.
I ‘think’ I got it right 9.5 million x 2 x 21 =
396,361,729 yes, nearly 400 million of us have Charlemagne’s dna in us
but belief me its pretty watered down ;) )))
and nothing to write home about, other than that Charlemagne, with all his visionary prowess, probably didn’t see that coming either…

 
Comment by Paul Script
2015-03-09 17:17:58

The ultimate pickup line….gonna get me some tonight!

 
Comment by Gunnar
2015-04-15 10:10:42

During WW2, the Allies bombed a number of German churches and cathedrals (plus towns that were of no strategic importance), and the cathedral at Aachen was one of them. At some point, German citizens removed the bones of Charlemagne from the cathedral and hid them in the woods. The Americans found them, and a soldier was told to bring them to a commanding officer. Upon arriving with the sack of bones, the soldier allegedly asked, “Where am I supposed to dump this?” So much beauty and history damaged or destroyed by all sides in this conflict, things that connected us long before twisted political ideologies separated us.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

August 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication