Queen Vic’s knicks

A pair of Queen Victoria’s linen bloomers and a matching chemise were found in a private collection this week.

Dating to around 1890, the monogrammed unmentionables have been hidden away in the collection for over a hundred years, probably given to a good and faithful servant as mementos of the Queen after her death.

Queen Victoria's bloomers and chemiseThe knickers were bought by Historic Royal Palaces at auction for £600 earlier this summer.

Alexandra Kim, curator of the Royal Ceremonial Dress Collection, said: “The drawers have quite a large waist – about 56 inches.

“By this stage in her life, Queen Victoria had gained quite a few inches.

“When she was about 18, her waist was about 20 inches… Over the years, particularly having given birth to nine children, that changed entirely.”

As well as featuring Queen Victoria’s monogram, the underwear has a laundry mark – a number which allowed it to be traced after it was sent to be washed.

The pants are what is felicitously known as “split drawers”, so now that it’s on display in the Royal Ceremonial Dress Collection, you too can see where Queen Victoria went pee pee.

The collection includes another 12,000 other pieces of clothing from royalty and courtiers over the past 400 years or so, see the slideshow from the article for some pictures.

My favorite is William III’s Christmas elf outfit. Seriously, can you even believe this is adult clothing?

William III stockings and vest

They have a design of a little flower, surmounted by a crown worked in at the ankle, and a ‘W’ in the cuff at the top. He is generally known as a serious monarch and soldier and it is fascinating to see that, informally, the King must have looked very dapper in his coloured stockings.

Like the dapperest of Christmas elves. :love:

Share

RSS feed

6 Comments »

Comment by Ensign Steve
2009-09-14 09:10:55

Oh my god I would be mortified if they put my grandma panties in a museum! :ohnoes:

My elf costume, on the other hand…

Comment by livius drusus
2009-09-14 11:14:02

Especially if your grandma wore split drawers ’cause I don’t even want to be thinking about your grandma putting them to their intended use. :skull:

 
 
Comment by Emma O W
2009-09-14 13:37:07

:blush: I saw this a week ago or so and was absolutely mortified. For some reason, this feels like so much more an invasion of privacy for me than the display of a skeleton in a museum. :skull:

Comment by livius drusus
2009-09-14 13:49:49

Oh, split drawers beat skulls for intimacy, hands down. If you’ll pardon the phrase. :giggle:

 
 
Comment by Sarah
2009-09-14 16:17:27

This is just the sort of thing that tickles my fancy best. Much thanks for finding it. Is there a link to the auction site? :love:

Comment by livius drusus
2009-09-14 17:10:14

It was sold by Hansons Auctioneers, who apparently sold another pair for way more money to a Canadian lady last year.

 
 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.