New technology finds York gladiators’ homelands

The latest and greatest DNA technology has revealed the origins of some of the 80 men buried in a Roman-era cemetery in York. The burials have intrigued and mystified archaeologists since they were first discovered under the garden of an 18th century mansion on Driffield Terrace in 2004. Of the 80 individuals, 48 of them, 60% of the total and 79% of the 61 skeletons with surviving crania and cervical vertebrae, had been decapitated from behind with a very sharp, very fine blade. Their heads were buried with them but not in anatomically correct or even consistent positions. Skulls were placed on the chest, between the legs and at their feet.

Decapitated remains have been found in Roman cemeteries before, but very few. One study tallied 98 decapitations making up 6% of the inhumation burials in cemeteries where decapitations were found. The York burials were so unique because of the unprecedented high proportion of decapitated individuals in the cemetery, four times higher than the proportion found in any other Romano-British cemetery. The second highest number of decapitations is 15 out of 94 burials (16%) unearthed from a Roman cemetery in Cassington, Oxfordshire.

Another unique feature of the Driffield Terrace burials is that they were all men. Decapitated individuals found in all the other Roman burial grounds had the usual demographic spread you’d expect of an attritional cemetery. There were men, women, young, old, adult, child. The York burials were also all under the age of 45 and taller than average. Five of them had other wounds inflicted by a blade besides the cuts to the neck, jaw, clavicle and scapula associated with decapitation. Two were stabbed in the abdomen; one was cut through the thigh muscles to the femur; two were parrying fractures to the forearm and hand, likely incurred trying to deflect a blow to the head. Sixteen individuals had perimortem blunt force trauma to the cranium. Evidence of healed trauma was rife, including cranial, facial, dental and metacarpal fractures that were likely incurred by violence. One skeleton’s pelvis showed signs of what may have been bite marks from a lion or bear.

Osteological evidence indicates they were trained to fight from a young age. Their right arms were consistently longer than their left, which means they’d been using weapons regularly since before they’d finished growing. Most them also showed signs of inadequate nutrition in childhood which they overcame to become healthy, strapping young men.

The single-sex grouping, young age, height and extensive evidence of violence indicated these were fighting men, but just what kind was unclear. The cemetery was southwest of the city walls of Roman Eboracum along the main road to Tadcaster just across the river from the legionary fortress. Legionaries had an age limit and height requirement. Gladiators or criminals sentenced to death were the other possibilities.

The placement of the cemetery atop a promontory on the main road makes it unlikely that they were criminals or outcasts. It’s too sweet a spot to leave it to executed criminals. The date of the burials — from the 2nd to the 4th century A.D. — was an important time for York. Roman emperor Septimius Severus actually lived in Eboracum off and on during the early 3rd century when it was the capital of the Britannia.

To determine the place of original of the individuals, a team from Trinity College Dublin used cutting-edge genomic analysis. DNA was extracted from the dense inner ear bones of seven of the Driffield Terrace burials and subjected to whole genome analysis.

The nearest modern descendants of the Roman British men sampled live not in Yorkshire, but in Wales. A man from a Christian Anglo-Saxon cemetery in the village of Norton, Teesside, has genes more closely aligned to modern East Anglia and Dutch individuals and highlights the impact of later migrations upon the genetic makeup of the earlier Roman British inhabitants.

However, one of the decapitated Romans had a very different story, of Middle Eastern origin he grew up in the region of modern day Palestine, Jordan or Syria before migrating to this region and meeting his death in York.

This is the first genomic analysis of ancient Britons, but given the precision of the results it’s certainly not the last.

Rui Martiniano who undertook the analysis said: “This is the first refined genomic evidence for far-reaching ancient mobility and also the first snapshot of British genomes in the early centuries AD, indicating continuity with an Iron Age sample before the migrations of the Anglo-Saxon period.”

You can read the full genomic study in this month’s Nature Communications.

9 thoughts on “New technology finds York gladiators’ homelands

  1. Awesome post. Thanks for included archaeological details.

    It’s important to note.

    6/7 York Gladiators(fighting men, whatever) were genetically closest to modern Welsh because Welsh were less affected by post-Roman era migrations into England not because they were from Wales. Welsh are ethnically Britons, just as these Gladiators were, but probably have non-Briton ancestry. 5/7 Gladiators based on isotope analysis were certainly born in or near York and not in Wales.

    It’s also important to note.

    1/7 of the Gladiators based on iostope analysis was born in Levant or North Africa and genetically is basically identical to modern people in the Levant. He’s the only Gladiator who was definitely from outside of York and Britain.

  2. Odd buggers, the Romans. Sometimes I think they are odder than we can ever imagine even though we know so much about them.

  3. Perhaps one day we can find out if there are descendents of the Numerus Barcariorum Tigeensium still living in South Shields / Arbeia ☺

  4. Septimius Severus was from North Africa. It is possible that he had brought his favorite gladiator with him when he moved to Britain. The lives of gladiators seems bazaar to modern man. Viewing their remains brings their life experiences to the fore. It is both interesting and tragic.

  5. From a previous post about this on here: “Although they died at different times over a range of 250 years and came from all over the Roman Empire, 85% of the skeletons show remarkably similar physical stresses, primarily on the right arms.”

    This now reads as “far-reaching ancient mobility” vs. some sort of (Welsh ?) “continuity” from the Iron Age to the Migration Period. Is the main “continuum” in Britain, however, not that particular mobility ? A comparison to the findings from that Ephesus Gladiator cemetery (cf. the other post) would also be of interest.

    The samples, moreover, of those six with ‘NW-European’ plus the one with ‘Middle Eastern’ connections, accompanied by the iron age one and the later Anglo-saxon one, seem not an awful lot. Has their tooth enamel been analyzed for reference ?

  6. I’m puzzled about the decapitation, even after reading your earlier post. Was the decapitation a coup de grace? (Sorry, can’t make italics on my computer)? By specifying “a sharp, fine blade” it doesn’t sound like a fatal wound from fighting. I mean, sure, sometimes a gladiator might get hit from behind, but not this many–right?

  7. I think they are more like us then you probably could imagine. they have a love of violence. most of the population was middle class or lower-class peasants. The rich own everything just as today. they were extremely litigious. Society was very diverse in many parts of the Empire. they had holidays that correlate directly to our calendar year holidays. they love to drink wine and eat exotic foods. they had their weird fish sauce but they still loved pepper and cinnamon. and they love silk just as much as Americans love polyester. they had well-trained army equal to modern Americans well-trained army. they had academics and politicians and artisans and businessman just like we do. I tend to think that the medieval era with nights in Kings in the feudal system is far more distant and different in Roman times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.