The great Ohio-Kentucky rock war

A large boulder that lived for centuries in the middle of the Ohio river serving both Kentuckians and Ohioans as a navigation marker and graffiti carving canvas, has turned out to be a powder keg.

Last September, an Ohio historian decided the rock needed rescuing from its watery bed, so he hauled it out and lovingly placed it in a safe environment for historical preservation: on top of some tires in a corner of the Portsmouth city maintenance garage.

The fact that the rock was a registered protected archaeological object with the state of Kentucky doesn’t seem to trouble our intrepid Ohioan.

The historian, Steve Shaffer of Ironton, Ohio, said people are overreacting. The rock, he said, was neglected and in danger of being damaged or lost forever. [...]

Shaffer says he deserves praise for saving the rock.

“They want to punish Portsmouth and they want to punish me and they want to put this rock back in the river,” Shaffer said.

Yeah! Meanie peanie fo-feanie Kentuckians with their anti-tireyardism and desire to preserve a protected object in its proper context. They’ll have to tell it to the judge.

Kentucky’s elected officials also insist that the rock belongs to their state. A Kentucky grand jury is investigating whether criminal charges should be filed and Portsmouth Mayor James Kalb has been subpoenaed to testify. Earlier this spring, Kentucky lawmakers adopted a resolution condemning the rock’s removal and demanding its return.

Ohio lawmakers are considering a counter-resolution calling on Kentucky to abandon its claim to the rock.

RSS feed

7 Comments »

Comment by Dina
2008-06-03 00:20:46

Of at least one thing we can be rock certain: that Ohio historian has a lot of chutzpah.

Comment by livius drusus
2008-06-03 16:22:05

That’s the stone cold truth right there. :giggle:

 
 
Comment by TomJoe
2008-06-03 15:21:27

So that’s where my rock went!

Comment by livius drusus
2008-06-03 16:24:16

I told you nothing good would come of you fording the Ohio. :no:

Comment by TomJoe
2008-06-05 13:54:57

Well, it (the rock) wanted to go for a walk. Any reasonable pet rock owner would walk their rock, no? Reminds me of the time Peter Griffin’s pet rock urinated on his floor. Now that was a bad rock.

Comment by TomJoe
2008-06-05 13:56:04
(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
Comment by livius drusus
2008-06-08 07:55:04

:lol: You’re in no position to judge, Mr. I’ll-let-Fluffy-run-off-leash-just-this-once.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Name
E-mail
URI

:love: :giggle: :evil: :chicken: :p :D :boogie: ;) :thanks: :notworthy: :shifty: :) :( :cry: :facepalm: :blankstare: :cool: :yes: :ohnoes: :angry: :hattip: :no: :confused: :eek: :lol: :blush: :skull:

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

December 2008
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication