Oldest bones of English royal found in Germany

Statue of Queen Eadgyth (L) and Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor (R)Queen Eadgyth (pronounced Edith) was the granddaughter of Alfred the Great. Her half-brother Athelstan unified disparate Saxon and Celtic kingdoms and is thus considered the first king of England.

When Eadgyth was 19, Athelstan sent her and her half-sister Algiva or Adiva to Germany, telling the then Duke of Saxony to pick the one he liked best. Eadgyth was said to the prettiest and the Duke married her in 929 A.D.

That Duke later became Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor. Eadgyth bore him two children and died at the young age of 36 in 946 A.D. She was buried in the Cathedral of Magdeburg. Otto died 26 years later in 973 and although he had remarried after her death, he chose to be buried next to Eadgyth in Magdeburg.

Their remains didn’t stay put. Over the years they were moved several times, the last time in 1510 when the fancy cenotaph was erected in the Cathedral. People thought that it was just a marker, not the actual location of her bones, so when archaeologists researching the cathedral opened the vault they were shocked to find a lead coffin marked with Queen Eadgyth’s name and the 1510 date.

Inside they found a skeleton wrapped in silk. The bones belong to a woman between the ages of 30 and 40. That’s not final confirmation that the bones belong to Queen Eadgyth, of course. We’ll have to wait for the results of chemical analysis to know for sure.

In particular they will try to match radioactive isotopes embedded in the bones to those found in her birthplace in England.

Professor Mark Horton, of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, who is co-ordinating the research, said: “We know that Saxon royalty moved around quite a lot, and we hope to match the isotope results with known locations around Wessex and Mercia, where she could have spent her childhood.

“If we can prove this truly is Eadgyth, this will be one of the most exciting historical discoveries in recent years. It is quite a surprise to find them so much in tact. It really is an important discovery.”

No earlier remains of an English royal are extant. Her brother Athelstan’s tomb is still extant in Malmesbury Abbey, Wiltshire, but archaeologists think it’s empty.

Tomb with lead coffin insideSilk-wrapped remains in lead coffin

Share

RSS feed

14 Comments »

Comment by Philip Coggan
2010-01-21 03:55:15

So King Alfred entered the gene-pool of Continental royalty thusly – so are there modern descendants? The Hapsburgs perhaps, who seem to be related to absolutely everybody?

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-21 10:50:30

Yessir. Otto I is related to ever German royal family that came after him, including the Hapsburgs, Hohenzollerns and Hohenstauffens, all through Eagdyth’s (and therefore Alfred’s) line.

 
Comment by gpoole
2010-07-14 04:02:51

“Thusly” ??? or “thuswise” Alfred would have been shocked.

 
 
Comment by Tilitoli
2010-01-21 05:21:10

:yes: Yes, Habsburgs really have relations in whole Europe… All the noblemen are descendants of this family

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-21 10:51:42

Between Alfred and Victoria, pretty much all the royals in Europe are some form of cousin.

Comment by Hans
2010-01-21 13:17:56

Not to be trite, but “royal” DNA is actually pretty common in Eureope. Just do the math by generations. This doesn’t even count the bastards in the lineage. It still fascinates the hell out of me.

Comment by Tilitoli
2010-01-21 14:38:04

Yes, at least one of our neighbours might be a king’s descendant. :lol:

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-21 14:42:18

Actually, according to one of my crazy great-aunts, we’re descended from some English King’s whore. So yeah, not terribly impressive. :giggle:

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sarah
2010-01-21 14:39:48

Actually, the great hoopla they’re making over this (while it is cool) sort of made me smile. Mostly, they are so excessively excited, as I understand it, because this would theoretically be the first (mostly) intact skeleton of that period.

However, they are (as far as I know) 95% sure that Alfred the Great’s body was buried in Glastonbury cathedral. The kicker, is that they’ve forgotten where in the floor they put him. Now since the cathedral itself is no longer intact, and damaging it by excavating wouldn’t be an issue – I can’t for the life of me understand why some poor fool doesn’t just go get a metal detector and FIND it. The space is not that big for god’s sake. They’d have an even older, even cooler, skeleton on their hands.

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-21 14:44:00

Oh way cooler. Alfred was 6’4″! He’s still the tallest king England has ever had.

Do they think maybe the bones were destroyed/hidden/messed with during the destruction of the monasteries? That’s why they think Athelstan’s tomb is empty.

Comment by Sarah
2010-01-21 15:34:16

That would make sense, and to be honest I have to say I don’t know. But my IMPRESSION is that he was buried under the floor at some point long before the dissolution and therefore wouldn’t have been damaged by the destruction of the cathedral.

Similarly, though on a slightly fantastic note, (during it’s physical existence) the cathedral boasted of having the bones of Guinevere and King Arthur. There was a very large tomb built for them which WAS destroyed during the dissolution, but unless I’m mistaken, the pair of bones are now buried in a marked spot in the cathedral ground.

Comment by Sarah
2010-01-27 16:34:41

Our conversation intrigued me and so I did some looking around. It appears I was either misinformed or misheard – the English king at Glastonbury was Edgar I, a later descendant of Alfred (which would make Eadgyth the earliest).

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-27 16:38:59

Ah, fascinating. Thank you for following up. What a shame there are no giant Alfred bones to gawk at. :(

 
 
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

July 2018
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication