Rare 14th-16th c. shipwrecks found in Stockholm

Archaeologists have discovered the wrecks of two ships in the Baltic Sea off Stockholm. That’s not unusual because the Baltic is a) really cold, and b) so saline that shipworm (and other assorted wood-eating critters), which can devour a wooden wreck in a matter of months, find it distinctly inhospitable. There are at least 100 intact ships on the Baltic Sea bed around Stockholm.

What is unusual about the two that have just been discovered is their age. One is a medieval cog believed to date to the 14th or early 15th century. The other is from the 16th century. Most of the ships that sank in Stockholm’s waters date to the 17th and 18th centuries when Sweden’s naval fleet was in its fullest fulgor.

Swedish National Maritime Museums (SNMM) divers found the wrecks just before Christmas while photographing and surveying the seabed for a new museum dedicated to the maritime archaeology of the Baltic Sea.

The wreckage from the Middle Ages is mostly submerged in mud and its details indicate that it is a cog, most likely from the 14th or 15th century. The ship is 23–25 meters in length and seven meters wide. It is likely to have had a mast with a square rig. More shipbuilding details indicate it being from the Middle Ages, such as protruding deck beams with unusually high knees and a simple anchor wheel. When cog ships were introduced on the seas they were a brand new, large and powerful type of ship that came to dominate large parts of the trade around the Baltic Sea for centuries.

The other shipwreck is estimated to be from the 16th century and still stands with the mast straight up and fully equipped. Some of the discoveries onboard include 20 barrels of osmond iron, kitchen utensils and tools. The extent of the iron found is unprecedented in previous maritime findings. Osmond iron has largely built Sweden, but also supported countries around the Baltic Sea. Gustav Vasa wanted to ban the iron, and this happened later in 1604 when osmond iron was replaced with wrought iron.

The SNMM is working on a ground-breaking new approach to shipwreck archaeology and display: leaving them where they are. Instead of investing in the risky, time-consuming and prohibitively expensive recovery of shipwrecks as was done with the incomparable Vasa, known wrecks and ones still to be discovered will stay on the Baltic Sea floor where they will be explored by marine archaeologists. The new maritime archaeological museum, to be built next to the Vasa‘s museum home in Stockholm, will display artifacts and fragments of wrecks recovered in the dives rather than the ships themselves. Visitors will still get a chance to see them, not in person after decades of conservation and restoration (always precarious), but as if they had been part of the diving team. The wonders of computer graphics and virtual reality technology make it possible to experience marine archaeological remains in their original context, in virtual situ, if you will.

The Treasures of the Baltic Sea museum is scheduled to open in 2020.

Share

RSS feed

7 Comments »

Comment by John K
2018-02-01 00:01:28

Shipworms live in the salt water of the worlds oceans. The water of the Baltic Sea is not salty enough for them to live there.

 
Comment by Trevor Butcher
2018-02-01 05:30:13

Still, they say that is changing, as ships arrive with water ballast from elsewhere, which gets exchanged as they reload – and so bringing the shipworms with them.

 
Comment by Susie Bar-Orian
2018-02-01 08:48:04

Interesting. And now I have some homework. I know what “wrought ” iron is, or at least have heard the term, but never heard of “osmond” iron. And didnt know ships had knees.

 
Comment by clio
2018-02-01 10:35:22

fulgor…a new word for me!

 
Comment by Irenaeus
2018-02-01 10:38:09

Even though I know nothing, I gonna cough up some sort of explanation:

Cast iron is rather brittle and e.g. contains too much carbon. Contrastingly, in ‘manageable’ iron, as in ‘steels’ and in ‘anything in between’, the correct composition, its crystalline structure and -additionally- several possible ‘processes’ and ‘treatments’ are key, and -thus- are defining the characteristics of the finished material.

As far as I understood the ‘osmond’ process, the iron structure is ‘loosened up’/ smelt, possibly even some more carbon is picked up, and the iron is then congealed into a ball or ‘osmond ball’ as an intermediate product. These, it seems, are then forged into bars (and the bars forged into something else), where the structure is changed once more and the superfluous amount of carbon removed – Maybe a proto- ‘steel’ ?

On the beams in the pics seem to be indeed ‘critters’ feeding on the wood. Seemingly, there is some biology going on there. Parts of my family, btw, had been living at the Baltic Sea ans where possibly involved in the production of ‘osmonds’ and their export to Sweden, while somebody else with my name was tortured to death by Swedish mercenaries in 1640 …Weird, thinking of it :confused:

 
Comment by George M.
2018-02-01 15:37:11

The osmond process is a way of converting pig iron to a form of wrought iron. Pig iron has too much carbon to be able to be forged into usable items. The osmond process involves heating the pig iron to a molten state and holding it in an air blast to convert much of the carbon to CO2. It comes out of the furnace in a rough ball shape which is often formed into bars with a large, often water driven, hammer and then goes into trade as raw material for blacksmiths.

The family name Osmond refers to an ancestor who was involved in iron production just like other occupational family names such as Smith, Wright, Carter, Weaver, Potter, etc..

 
Comment by Susie Bar-Orian
2018-02-01 23:02:27

Thanks everyone for info. Really helped.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

September 2018
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication