1,247 Roman coins found buried in Colchester

Archaeologists excavating the site of the former Hyderabad and Meeanee barracks (turn of the century barracks that housed the 3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment until new quarters were built in 2008, now slated for redevelopment) have uncovered a hoard of 1,247 Roman coins from the 3rd century A.D. The coins were packed in a large pot. Another pot was found alongside of it, but it was empty; most likely the owner had cashed in its contents but kept the empty pot in place in case he needed it for future hoarding.

We can tell from the way the coins are layered — not in date order — that the pot was filled and buried at one time, not by adding coins over time piggy bank style. The coins are still in little stacks, suggesting that the owner counted them and carefully added the piles to the pot.

The coins are of a type known as antoniniani. The hoard is made up of issues of at least nine Roman emperors ranging from Gallus (251-3) to Victorinus (269-271). The latest coins in the hoard point to a date for its deposition in the early part of AD 271.

The antoninianus started life off as a silver coin issued in the early 3rd century but, by the time of the Hyderabad hoard, it had become very debased and ended up as a copper-alloy coin with a very thin silver coating. Severe inflation reduced its monetary value which is why later antoniniani are common finds on archaeological sites of the third quarter of the 3rd century. The Hyderabad hoard belongs to this period.

This was a turbulent time for the Roman Empire known as the Crisis of the Third Century. Twenty-five emperors reigned between 235 and 284, and in 260, under pressure from barbarian invasions, the empire split into three warring sections. The province of Britannia joined Gaul, Hispania and Germania to form the Gallic Empire under the control of the Batavian usurper Postumus. Postumus was himself usurped and was killed by his own troops in 268. The Gallic Empire fell apart and a chain of would-be emperors followed for a few years until the Emperor Aurelian reclaimed the provinces after his victory in the Battle of Châlons in 274.

The unrest would have been keenly felt in Colchester (aka Camulodunum), which was the first Roman city in Britain and was garrisoned with Roman troops since the Legio XX Valeria Victrix set up shop in 43 A.D. Garrison towns stop being protected and start being dangerous when the military is infighting and throwing up usurpers every other month. Postumus’ troops killed him because he wouldn’t let them sack the city of Mainz, after all, so burying pots full of coins in a field was probably a wise strategy not just to avoid thieves prospering under the chaos, but also to avoid the military run amok.

The field in question was part of the system of defensive earthwork walls (known as dykes despite no water being involved). The hoard was buried in the ditch behind the Berechurch Dyke, part of 15 miles of earthwork defenses originally built a hundred years before the Claudian invasion of Britain and reinforced by the Romans.

This isn’t the first hoard of Roman coins found in the Colchester area, and the others have all been from the mid-to-late third century as well. Two hoards were found a hundred years ago, and a huge group of 6,000 antoniniani was discovered in 1983.

The hoard has been reported to the Portable Antiquities Scheme as potential treasure. When, as seems inevitable, it is declared treasure, the property owners, developing firm Taylor Wimpey, plan to donate the find to the Colchester Museum as they have done with everything else that has been found on the barracks site thus far.

Share

RSS feed

7 Comments »

Comment by bort
2011-05-21 00:28:19

Yegads! The temptation to, as the youth say, “make it rain” must have been overwhelming! That kind of secret stash find is intoxicating! I daresay I would have also been tempted not to report it at all. (Though my dreams most certainly would have been haunted by a certain destructive archaeologist, if you know what I mean.)

 
Comment by livius drusus
2011-05-21 02:45:13

Oh I know just what you mean. In this particular case, though, the chances to succumb to the dark side are minimized by the coins having been found during an official archaeological dig rather than just by a dude with a metal detector.

 
Comment by Edward Goldberg
2011-05-21 03:11:47

“Mr. Bort, would you be so good as to leave your metal detector at the door? Thank you very much indeed.”

 
Comment by livius drusus
2011-05-21 04:01:04

We’re on to him now, Edward. HE’LL NEVER GET IT AWAY WITH IT.

 
Comment by Mr. Murphy in VA
2011-05-21 09:19:45

It is refreshing to read, over and over, how the English handle the discovery of these treasures. The generosity of the developing firm, I am sure, serves its long term interests much better than trying to cash in on these finds–as it should.

 
Comment by doolb rimy
2011-05-21 22:13:58

Heh. Hyperbad and Meanie. Good one.

 
Comment by Rasiel
2011-09-01 00:56:46

Very interesting read, not least of which for the fact that the finders are so altruistically donating the whole lot of it to a regional museum!

I disagree however with the assessment that the deposit was built gradually over the years due to the 20-year age spread. This is actually a very narrow window. In the Rome of AD 271 any random number of coins in circulation would have had a high percentage of these antoniniani dating back to the early 240’s under the reign of Gordian III. The dating spread actually suggests the opposite: that the coins were stashed together in a hurry from coins minted in the nearby mints of Lugdunum and Colonia Agrippinensis whose local economy was by 271 rapidly deteriorating relative to the rest of the Roman empire and thus forcing the marginally richer in silver pre-secession coins of the 240’s and 250’s to be melted rather than spent.

To learn more about these emperors and see their coins check out the Dirty Old Coins database at http://www.dirtyoldcoins.com

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

November 2019
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication