Mystery stained glass mentioned by Van Gogh found

In 1876, a 23-year-old Vincent van Gogh was teaching at a small boarding school in Ramsgate, England, and living in Isleworth with the family of the Rev. Thomas Slade-Jones, Congregationalist minister and the school’s owner. It was an unpaid position with a hellish commute. He wrote to his brother Theo of his daily life teaching students Bible history and weeding the garden, of his dreams of becoming a clergyman. This was a period of increasing religious devotion for Vincent. His letters are packed full of his thoughts on Biblical passages, of his desire to spend less time teaching and more time helping Mr. Jones minister to his flock.

In a letter to Theo from October 7, 1876, Vincent reported walking almost six hours (!) to London to collect some school fees for Rev. Jones. While roaming the Strand neighborhood, recently rebuilt and now a home to many of the literary and artistic avant-garde, he encountered some old friends and had dinner.

After that I went to [art dealer] van Wisselingh, where I saw sketches for two church windows. In the middle of one window stands the portrait of a middle-aged lady, oh, such a noble face, with the words “Thy will be done,” over it, and in the other window the portrait of her daughter, with the words, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” There, and in the gallery of Messrs. Goupil & Co., I saw beautiful pictures and drawings. It is such an intense delight to be so often reminded of Holland by art.

Van Gogh scholars have long searched for these church windows, and it seems they’ve finally found them in a small church, St. Andrew’s, in Owslebury, near Winchester. The two windows are almost exactly as Vincent describes them, only one inscription — “Faith is the substance of things hoped for” — was changed to “Fear not, only believe” between design and execution.

William Carnegie, 8th Earl of Northesk, commissioned the windows as memorials to his wife Georgiana and his daughter Lady Margaret as older and younger versions of the Virgin Mary. Georgiana died in 1874 at age 63, after 31 years of marriage. Margaret died in 1871 at just 23 years of age. The windows were installed in the church after his death in 1878.

Art historian Max Donnelly found the windows while researching the glazier, Daniel Cottier, and put two and two together in a serendipitous leap.

Donnelly said: “I saw a reference to them at the church in Owslebury and managed to get some photographs. It was then that bells started ringing, and it happened to be about the same time as the exhibition of Van Gogh’s letters at the Royal Academy.

“Although the letter mentioning the sketches was not among them, it reminded me that he had written to his brother.”

Donnelly contacted the earl’s descendants and was pointed in the direction of the family scrapbook. “Inside I found photographs of the people involved and photographs of the designs that Van Gogh had described,” said Donnelly. “I assume that the 8th earl sent copies to family members showing them what he was intending for the church to the memory of his wife and daughter.

“This proved that the windows were the ones Van Gogh had seen.”

Share

RSS feed

6 Comments »

Comment by Hels
2011-08-30 05:23:30

I love stories like this. It goes to show that

1. van Gogh wrote down details that other people would perhaps glance at and never mention eg “I went to art dealer van Wisselingh, where I saw sketches for two church windows.” Had the art dealer not been Dutch, perhaps even van Gogh would have paid scant attention.

2. van Gogh’s letter survived

3. art historian Max Donnelly found the windows while researching a glazier

4. the windows were manufactured largely as designed and

5. the windows survived!

What an amazing string of events that had to happen. van Gogh’s God worked in mysterious ways.

Comment by livius drusus
2011-08-30 23:16:35

Amen! On a far less notable scale, somebody had to upload every letter Vincent wrote to Theo to a free website so that you and I could enjoy the full context of the find.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Murphy in VA
2011-08-30 07:28:36

What a contrast from today, where memorials to your loved-ones appear on plaques in the lobby and plates on the park bench.

Comment by livius drusus
2011-08-30 23:13:56

I think we need more stained glass in general, memorial or otherwise.

 
 
Comment by Edward Goldberg
2011-08-31 02:57:51

Let’s fill the world with stained glass? It’s a nice idea, but alas, we are not living in the days of Abbot Suger nor even Daniel Cottier. And virtually all recent stained glass is sheer hell to look at. In churches these days, there seem to be two options: (1) silly cosmic swirls, and (2) silly cosmic swirls with cut-and-paste “symbols”. Stained glass really is a figurative medium and almost no one is up to THAT anymore. So Chagall manages to squeak by (just barely) while the jury is still out on Louis Comfort Tiffany, landscapes and all. Of course, there is always heraldic glass… Lots of that at the last Whitney Biennial!

Comment by livius drusus
2011-08-31 13:49:54

I’m with you entirely on the cosmic swirl problem (although Chagall still counts for me because the America Windows glow so beautifully). We need a revival of medieval craftsmanship, maybe luring buyers with a modern spin on how green and healthy old school stained glass is.

 
 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.