Million dollar schoolgirl embroidery

Silk on linen sampler by Mary Antrim, 1807A silk on linen needlework sampler stitched by 12-year-old Mary Antrim in 1807 sold at Sotheby’s Important Americana sale in New York on Sunday for $1,070,500 (including buyer’s premium). That’s ten times more than its pre-sale estimate of $80,000-$120,000.

Girls at that time (and from the 17th century through to the 20th) were taught needlework from a very young age, both in school and at home. They proved their skill, virtue and industry by creating samplers. Early samplers had a utilitarian aspect, teaching girls schoolwork as they stitched things like letters of the alphabet, maps and mathematical tables, but by the 18th century the focus had shifted to a more pictorial approach. Mary’s elaborate design of farm life, featuring symmetrical vignettes of trees, animals, houses, fruit bowls and an elegant lady riding side-saddle is an exquisite example of pictorial needlework. She was the daughter of weaver John Antrim, so she came by her extraordinary skills honestly.

The piece was one of 198 lots from the collection of needlework historian Betty Ring who wrote the definite reference books on the subject and pretty much single-handedly elevated the entire field of folk art needlework with her scholarship and her collecting. Sotheby’s has put her seminal books on the subject, Girlhood Embroidery Volume I, Volume II and American Needlework Treasures online. They are so rich with illustrations even just paging through them is a beautiful voyage of exploration.

Embroidered and painted silk mourning picture by Betsey Clarke, Miss Patten's School, Hartford, CT, ca. 1809The sale of the Ring collection totaled $4,389,503, over a million dollars above the total estimates, which is particularly remarkable considering that a quarter of the lots didn’t sell at all. Most of the unsold pieces were memorial samplers, depicting veiled mourners, weeping willows and gravestones stitched in memory of a deceased loved one. Interestingly, when Girlhood Embroidery was first published in 1993, it was positively reviewed by The Wall Street Journal (to this day it’s the only book about American decorative arts ever reviewed by the WSJ) and that reviewer was creeped out by mourning pieces. His description of them as “eerily premonitory of Edward Gorey” is supposed to be negative, I suppose, but I think it’s a ringing endorsement. The one pictured on the right, embroidered and painted on silk by Betsey Clarke, at Miss Patten’s School, Hartford, CT, ca. 1809, is one of the ones that didn’t sell. I find it gloriously Gorey-esque.

Sotheby’s press release declares the Mary Antrim sale established a new record sale price for a needlework sampler at auction. It’s not the greatest sale price ever garnered by a young woman’s embroidery, though, so either they made a mistake or they’re defining needlework sampler in a way I don’t understand. The most expensive sampler ever sold is View of Boston Common by Hannah Otis (1732-1801), stitched around 1750. It’s a huge piece, meant for display over a chimney mantelpiece, embroidered in wool and silk on linen canvas. It was purchased by the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston at Sotheby’s in 1996 for a record $1,157,500.

"View of Boston Common" by Hannah Otis, ca. 1750

Its historical subject matter drove the price. It captures the Boston Common during the colonial era, complete with British flag flying over the Block House (destroyed in 1761) on the left, the actual beacon on Beacon Hill, and in the middle the Thomas Hancock house with a wealthy young man on his horse accompanied by a black groom in front of it. Thomas Hancock was the father of John Hancock, he of massive signature fame. The young man on the horse could well be John Hancock himself, and the couple on the left his mother and father.

Hannah Otis is closely linked to the American Revolution and American history in general. She was born in 1732, the daughter of Colonel James Otis and Mary Allyne Otis. Her mother was a descendant of Mayflower passenger Edward Doty. Her father was a judge and representative to the Massachusetts legislature. He was a fervent anti-royalist as was his son, James Otis, Jr., who introduced the phrase “Taxation without representation is tyranny” during the Stamp Act debates. Hannah’s older sister Mercy Otis Warren was a poet, playwright and historian who published numerous pro-Revolution writings and corresponded with the luminaries of the American Revolution like John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and John Adams.

The sampler remained in the Otis family until the 1996 sale. It had been on loan at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts for over 40 years when the family decided reluctantly that they had to sell it.

The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston was determined to buy the needlework, which was consigned to Sotheby’s by Martha Gray Otis (b. 1943) and her brother, Samuel Allyne Otis (b. 1940), who felt they could not afford to give it to the museum. “We are happy to have the museum have it; we hated to take it away from them,” said Martha Otis after the sale. “My greatest joy, besides being out of debt, is that the Boston museum has it.”

It was estate planning that drove the Otises to sell the needlework. “We are not wealthy enough to own it and pay inheritance taxes, and now by the time we pay the capital gains tax, we are not talking about a fortune divided between the eight of us,” Martha Otis continued. “I think Hannah Otis, who struggled to support herself, taking in borders and running a shop, would be pleased to know that the monies from the sale of her needlework will give my children and my brother Sam’s children a boost when they need it.”

Share

RSS feed

11 Comments »

Comment by Edward Goldberg
2012-01-26 03:45:48

Hmmm, yes? Mary Antrim’s sampler is awesome…but there is such a lot of awesome going around these days! For $1,070,500, you could fill your rec room with major seventeenth century Florentine paintings. Meanwhile, you could probably acquire all of Colonial Williamsburg for what Ronald Lauder spent on a few Vienna Secession knick-knacks. It just goes to show…something!

Comment by livius drusus
2012-01-26 17:03:35

How about that somebody somewhere will pay anything for something they really, really like? I know, not exactly a dramatic chipmunk level revelation, but … something!

 
 
Comment by doolb rimy
2012-01-26 09:56:40

I for one, hate people who come upon their needlework skills dishonestly.

Also, I would gladly display the mourning pieces.

Comment by livius drusus
2012-01-26 16:58:08

I thought you just might. Would you pay 60 grand for one, though?

 
 
Comment by edahstip
2012-01-26 17:26:39

I was hoping you would be able to help me with that.

Comment by livius drusus
2012-01-26 17:29:47

Oh sure. Just give me a couple of days to get a second mortgage.

 
 
Comment by Sam Cloth
2012-02-01 16:05:08

Does anyone know why Betty’s collection went up at this particular time?

Comment by livius drusus
2012-02-01 18:14:21

I don’t know, I’m afraid. Betty has advanced Alzheimer’s, but some people say she arranged for the sale before becoming non compos mentis and others seem to think her family might be taking advantage of her infirmity because Betty would never willingly disperse her collection.

 
 
2012-02-02 04:14:29

This blog is very important for visitors and embroidery designers. Get more information visit embroiderystitchnitch.com.

 
Comment by Susan
2012-02-08 18:51:54

Sotheby’s press release is correct and here’s why: The Mary Antarim sampler is just that – a sampler. The Boston chimneypiece that you cite is NOT A SAMPLER; it is needlework – a figural landscape or pastoral scene to be exact. So to compaqre the prices of hte two pieces is a little like comparing apples and oranges – both fruit, but with some important differences.

Comment by livius drusus
2012-02-09 00:14:56

Thank you kindly. What exactly is the definition of a sampler? Does it have to be schoolwork or is it the subject matter that makes a sampler?

 
 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.