The movie history book that cast a spell on young Martin Scorsese

Some time ago, I watched a documentary called A Personal Journey with Martin Scorsese Through American Movies. The title says it all, really. It’s about the movies that influenced Scorsese to become a director, the ones he loved as a boy, the ones that shaped his understanding of film. Since he’s a huge, huge movie nerd, he covers an enormous amount of ground, including pictures that are largely forgotten today. It’s the kind of thing you take notes on in the hope you might get a chance to see some of these films one day.

The documentary opens with a scene from The Bad and the Beautiful, a 1952 movie about movies starring Kirk Douglas, Lana Turner, and my secret favorite Dick Powell, in which Kirk Douglas’ producer character argues with the director about how to shoot a scene. At the 3:00 mark, Scorsese appears for the first time, sitting in a chair facing the camera. He’s holding a book. He starts talking:

I guess I have to say that when I was growing up in the 40s and 50s, I spent a lot of time in movie theaters. I became obsessed with movies. At that time there was nothing really available that I could find written on film except one book, sort of my first film book, although I couldn’t really afford to buy it and I couldn’t find a copy except the only one available from the New York Public Library. I borrowed it from the library repeatedly. It’s called A Pictorial History of the Movies by Deems Taylor, and it was a pictorial history of the movies in black and white stills, year by year, up to 1949.

The book cast a spell on me, ’cause back then I hadn’t seen many of the films shown here in the book, so all I had at my disposal to experience these films were these black and white stills. I’d fantasize about them and they’d play into my dreams and I was so tempted to steal some of these pictures from the book. It’s a terrible urge. After all, it’s a book from the public library. Well, I confess: once or twice I did give in to that urge.

[youtube=http://youtu.be/w0yuKp55cuw?list=PL7K7UEvDonQ0Y_f0jnBNZMo43KYjXz5lP&w=430]

This was in an era before the proliferation of university film schools, when the industry was still new enough that taking a scholarly approach to its history seemed incongruous. In fact, when this book was first published in 1943, there was exactly one film school in the entire world: the Gerasimov Institute of Cinematography in Moscow, founded in 1919 by director Vladimir Gardin. The next one, the Film and TV School of the Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, was founded in 1946, three years after the first edition of A Pictorial History of the Movies was published. The United States didn’t get a dedicated film school until 1969 when the American Film Institute‘s Conservatory was established.

Scorsese beat the AFI to the punch, graduating with a master’s degree in film from the Graduate Film program of New York University’s School of the Arts (today the Tisch School of the Arts) in 1966, the year after the program was founded and the year that the author of the book that had ensorceled baby Martin Scorsese to deface it died.

Deems Taylor was a well-known composer, commentator and music critic. Born in 1885, like Scorsese, he too was a graduate of NYU who had made a name for himself as a composer of cantatas in the late nineteenteens. He had great success with two operas he composed for the Metropolitan Opera — The King’s Henchman (1927) and Peter Ibbetson (1929) — now all but forgotten. He was a member of the famed Algonquin Roundtable, the New York literati who gathered to skewer each other over lunch at the Algonquin Hotel, and dated the sharpest skewer of them all, Dorothy Parker, for a short time.

While Taylor’s compositions and critiques languish in obscurity today, he was nationally famous in his day. He was on the cover of Time magazine in 1931. He was a pitchman for California wines in 1940, his elegance and erudition lending much-needed panache to an American viticulture industry that had been nearly destroyed by Prohibition. Only fortified desert wines like sherry sold well in the United States (you can see that referenced in the ad) but it wasn’t because they paired well with roasts; it’s because they were taxed at a lower rate than hard liquors but had 20% alcohol so they provided the best bang for one’s buck. Table wines didn’t outsell fortified wines in America until 1968.

Fame is fickle, however, and if Deems Taylor is known at all today it is solely for his role as the Master of Ceremonies who introduces each music segment in Disney’s innovative 1940 masterpiece Fantasia. Walt Disney and the conductor Leopold Stokowski of the Philadelphia Orchestra had heard Taylor doing commentary for radio broadcasts of the New York Philharmonic and brought him in on the project. Taylor contributed to some of the musical selections, advocating strongly for the inclusion of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring (the dino wars segment) which even a quarter century after its 1913 premiere in Paris caused an uproar, was still considered controversial.

(Random historical connection: Deems Taylor’s only earlier credited work in films was as composer for 1924’s Janice Meredith, a Revolutionary War period piece that was one of the “serious” movies William Randolph Hearst produced to fancy up his mistress Marion Davies from a bubbly comedienne into a dramatic actress. It was a dismal failure, of course.

This is probably a coincidence but it’s a neat one so I am compelled to point out that at 3:18 in the first segment of A Personal Journey, Scorsese stops on a page in A Pictorial History of the Movies. The bottom left and top right stills are from Fantasia. The bottom right still is from Citizen Kane.)

That was pretty much it as far as Taylor’s film career went. He had a brief cameo playing himself in 1941’s version of Camp Rock, The Hard-Boiled Canary, and the rest is TV appearances, primarily on panel quiz shows like What’s My Line?. He must have caught the bug, though, because the first edition of A Pictorial History of the Movies was printed in 1943, three years after Fantasia hit theaters.

It obviously filled a need, because the book went into a second print run in its first year, and this was during World War II when there was paper rationing. Marilyn Monroe had a copy. Scorsese’s edition was printed in 1950, which means it was updated and reissued at least once at the end of the decade.

This preciousness of this volume to Scorsese makes me appreciate the times we live in, because yesterday while nerding around the Internet Archive, I just happened to come across the second 1943 printing of A Pictorial History of the Movies fully digitized and available for any young movie buffs to access whenever their hearts desire. Good resolution, too. You can see far more detail in the online version of those black and white stills than Martin Scorsese ever could cutting them out of the New York Public Library’s copy. I spent half the weekend reading it, and while it’s obviously dated and limited in scope, it’s still a total page turner, a mini-education in film.

Share

RSS feed

10 Comments »

Comment by rita Roberts
2015-01-19 03:45:37

Interesting post. Although I know nothing of the writers of the old films. In my day the directors were Alfred Hitchcock. Cecile B De-Mill and others in that Era. I still love to see some of the old black and white movies as they always seem so sharp and crisp and almost always have a good story line. Give me the old films any day for this reason.

 
Comment by John Fentner
2015-01-19 06:54:51

“Born in 1885, like Scorsese,”

Heh…I know that’s not what you meant but it did make for a quick double take. ;)

 
Comment by Fred Brandes
2015-01-19 09:35:51

I would love to still be in the New York area and to visit the New York library. Perhaps I might pull Scorsese’s mutiliated copy of A Pictorial History and see just which stills tempted him.

 
Comment by Jeff G.
2015-01-19 14:03:32

That is all you have to say about this glorious commentary. I had to read it again so well crafted covering territory as well. I am a regular follower of this blog and can’t say how happy it makes me and gratefull to have been lucky enough to have stumbled upon such fine journalism. Thank you L. Jeff

 
Comment by drive-by music guy
2015-01-19 14:27:11

I thought Deems Taylor sounded somehow familiar but it took me a while to remember what for. When music writers need to rummage for a contrarian opinion on Mahler, he is sometimes dug up for a very well-worn quote on how Mahler’s symphonies could be edited down to twenty minutes and that one day a lover of Mahler will do just that. He was no Herostratus…

 
Comment by R. T.
2015-01-19 15:14:45

Damn, I am impressed. I’ve been digging through the Internet, looking for quality history blogs. Eureka! Yours is just what the doctor ordered. While I do not have much time to comment more now, I promise (not a threat) to be back again every now and then.

 
Comment by Rosie Sexson
2015-01-19 23:07:03

I have a question which it’s hard for me to tell you what I’m trying to convey. What I need to do is send a photo of this too you in your email and maybe you can help me understand what this is and what it means.. I’ve seen this in a antique store and was going to buy it but my husband refused to let me buy it since he said it was kind of creepy. it’s a Indian man who is wearing a headdress with feathers, and the woman is lying down on a platform with her being held by the Indian man. then their is all kinds of descriptions in the back of them which I don’t understand the meaning. It looks to be a Mayan or Aztac. (forgive me of my horrible spelling) I’m really needing to know what this is. Let me know if you like for me to send you a photo in the email. Thank you for your help!! :)

 
Comment by John Cooper
2015-01-21 12:37:02

I think I’ve seen that velvet painting…

 
Comment by John Cooper
2015-01-21 12:44:02

Thanks for the great information about Deems Taylor! I hugely enjoy learning about people (particularly in the arts) who were very well known in their day and whose influence is everywhere, but who are virtually forgotten now—Norman Corwin also comes to mind.

Incidentally, while every movie lover has to see A Personal Journey with Martin Scorsese, I don’t think I’m the only one who finds that many of the movies that Scorsese gushes about…just aren’t that good, taken as a whole. The ability to see the great elements in a mediocre movie is part of Scorsese’s genius.

 
Comment by Michael
2016-10-08 14:40:23

If you like that kind of story, you should read his biography for some great details. It’s a good read, in my opinion.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

September 2019
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication