Volunteers wanted to be mummified on TV

Britain’s Channel 4 is searching for a terminally ill person to volunteer to have his or her body mummified on television then displayed in a museum for 2 years.

A documentary production company is working with an unnamed scientists who thinks he has figured out the exact Egyptian mummification procedure. They’ve tested it on pigs and it shows promise, apparently, so now they want to go all the way and try it on a human being.

The Independent sent an undercover reporter posing as a potential volunteer to interview with the production company, Fulcrum TV which has otherwise not commented on the record. It’s a pretty creepy interview, not surprisingly. They want to follow the volunteer around with cameras for a couple of months to “understand who you are and what sort of person you are so the viewers get to know you and have a proper emotional response to you,” ie, watch you die.

[Executive producer Richard] Belfield said that no payment would be made, not even to help relatives after the volunteer’s death: “No not as such. Of course we would cover all costs. But the advice from our compliance lawyers is that it would be wrong to offer payment.”

He added: “The Egyptians were extremely clever organic chemists. Some of the materials they used came from as far afield as Burma and the Far East. One resin they used we know only existed in Burma. One thing we want to explore is how they developed their knowledge of chemistry.

“If you would like to think about it over the weekend you can call me at any time. Let me give you my numbers…”

The museum display after mummification isn’t obligatory, you’ll be glad to know. They run a classy operation, after all.

The thing is, it’s a perfectly legitimate pursuit to investigate the mummification procedure, which has never been fully explained. I’m sure many people who are interested in leaving their bodies to science would be glad to get mummified. It’s the reality TV part that’s gross.

Share

RSS feed

8 Comments »

Comment by Whacked Daddy
2010-01-12 01:52:35

Sounds like the show will be picked up by Fox here in the US. They should pay the family/estate something.

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-12 14:16:54

I can see how there would be a big potential for legal problems when paying someone for a dead body, even when said dead body agreed to it while still living.

Fox probably wouldn’t be interested because there’s too much of a whiff of scientific endeavor along with the exploitation and crassness. They avoid the former altogether, usually. ;)

 
 
Comment by Mr Lemming
2010-01-12 11:33:57

That is pretty disgusting. It was only a matter of time though; the Running Man is just around the corner! :eek:

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-12 14:17:50

Let’s just be relieved they don’t plan to process the body into food pellets. As far as we know. :shifty:

Comment by bingley
2010-01-14 08:55:24

I believe that pieces of mummy were a popular ingredient in medicines from the 16th to 18th centuries, and even into the 19th century in some parts of Europe.

Comment by livius drusus
2010-01-14 08:59:02

True, true. SOYLENT MUMMY IS PEOPLE!1 :giggle:

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Mr Lemming
2010-01-15 14:52:55

hahhahahahahahahah! Or WAS anyhow. :lol:

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by MiKE M
2013-08-05 00:07:36

LOL about your Faux News dig in your comment!

I agree about the mummifying thing for scientific pursuits. Also about your negative commentary about the “reality TV” part. If it must be filmed, it should be done documentary-style. Seems a lot less….hhmmmm…..crass. You used the word “crassness” in your comment section. I approve of that word!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

October 2020
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication