Jaw-dropping 19th c. Roman micromosaic for sale

micromosaic of the Roman Forum, by Cesare Roccheggiani, ca. 1879Still wounded that nobody bought me that $45 million Turner painting, I could learn to love again if you get me this amazing micromosaic from ca. 1879 of almost the exact same scene: a panoramic view of the Roman Forum with the Colosseum in the distance. It will go under the hammer on January 30th at Myers Auction Gallery in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Detail from middle leftWhat makes this piece so astonishing is that it’s made entirely of hundreds of thousands of itsy bitsy teeny weeny pieces of opaque colored glass. The mosaic is 59 inches wide, 32 inches long and weighs over 100 pounds. It’s so huge and heavy the frame had to be supported with iron straps.

Detail bottom rightAlthough there is no artist’s signature, the piece is attributed with surety to Cesare Roccheggiani, a master mosaicist who worked at the Vatican workshops from 1856 to 1864 and moonlighted making popular micromosaics for the Grand Tour crowd and for art dealers at his private atelier. There were as many as 96 mosaicists working in Rome by 1874, but most of them produced smaller items like cameos and jewelry and small plaques for the tourist trade. A piece of this size would not have been the usual tourist purchase. This kind of magnificence was reserved for aristocrats and the very wealthy, and was probably commissioned rather than purchased off the rack.

Since the 1920s, the artwork had rested above a mantel in the residence of a prominent Tampa businessman. When the home was sold in the 1980s, the buyer was given the option of purchasing some of the existing furnishings. The micromosaic was among the pieces selected. Now, through descent, the estate artwork is headed to auction.

“While unsigned, we believe it is almost certainly the work of Roccheggiani,” said Michael Myers, founder and co-owner of Myers Auction Gallery. “A micromosaic nearly identical in size and subject matter, and artist-signed by Rocchegiani, was auctioned last month at Christie’s London gallery for more than half a million dollars.”

The exquisite artistry in the circa-1879 work to be auctioned by Myers renders a photorealistic quality. “It’s so luminous, it even fooled a visitor who walked into our gallery and thought they were looking at a picture on a flat-screen TV,” said Mary Dowd, Michael’s wife and business partner. “An artwork as stunning as this one would have been very expensive in its day and available only to a very wealthy buyer.”

Some things never change. The estimate is a conservative $100,000-$200,000, but given the Christie’s result from December, I think we can safely say that figure will be eclipsed.

NB: if you compare the Turner painting to this mosaic, you can see how much more excavation was done in the area between 1839 and 1879. Granted, Turner’s beautiful glowing mist isn’t exactly photorealistic, but look particularly at the Arch of Septimus Severus in the lower left. In Turner’s time it looks almost sunken at the base of a hill. By the time Roccheggiani made his mosaic, that area is cleared, paved and staired.

Those are the results of the final defeat of the Pope, inclusion of Rome into a unified Italy in 1870 and the subsequent push to revive the city’s ancient past.

'Modern Rome - Campo Vaccino', J.M.W. Turner, 1839 micromosaic of the Roman Forum, by Cesare Roccheggiani, ca. 1879

Share

RSS feed

6 Comments »

Comment by edahstip
2011-01-14 00:25:44

I would gladly purchase this for you, but I’m afraid you might cut yourself on the glass.

Comment by livius drusus
2011-01-14 02:56:42

I’ll be careful every time I caress it obsessively, promise.

 
 
Comment by Kris
2011-01-15 12:42:29

The magnified detail showing three people may help date this piece. They are wearing hoop skirts and long shawls tapering to a point. These were in fashion only briefly between 1858 and 1866. The bell shape is more characteristic of the early portion of those years as skirts were becoming ellipical and ultimately led to the bustle as time went on.

Seems odd he’d have used a dress style long out of fashion by 1879. Nonetheless, a gorgeous work of art!

Comment by livius drusus
2011-01-16 02:09:40

It looks to me like the fullness of the skirts is concentrated on the behind which was definitely an 1870s fashion rather than the even fullness of earlier hoop skirts. The man’s short frock coat is also in 1870s style.

It’s hard to tell. I wish there were a frontal view to give us a better idea.

 
 
Comment by Auron Renius
2011-01-15 16:29:44

I wish I had $100,000 for a piece of art, or for anything really lol

Comment by livius drusus
2011-01-16 02:09:50

You and me both, brother.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Navigation

Search

Archives

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Other

Add to Technorati Favorites

Syndication