Anglo-Saxon bag rings made of African elephant ivory

Ivory bag rings discovered in Anglo-Saxon women’s graves have been identified as elephant ivory from contemporary African elephants. A new study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports has taken a multi-disciplinary approach to examine the ivory and narrow down its origin.

Bag rings have been unearthed in the graves of high-status Anglo-Saxon women in more than 70 cemeteries across England ranging in date from the late 5th to the 7th century A.D. (Ivory rings of around the same date have been found in graves in northern Germany, but far fewer of them than in England.) They are placed at the hip and originally formed the opening of an organic bag worn at the waist along with other objects (tools, knives, girdle hangers).

The rings were smoothed and polished to a high shine and reconstructions based on traces of textile remains indicate the bags hung off the rings so that the ivory was visible. Ivory was a rare and expensive material in early Anglo-Saxon England. Showing it off would have been a conspicuous display of wealth and status.

The source of the ivory for the bag rings has been subject of scholarly debate since they were first discovered in the 19th century. Elephant ivory was not seen as a likely candidate because the trade in African and Asian elephant ivory was believed to have ground to a halt with the fall of the western Roman Empire. Walrus ivory was the dominant source in the later Anglo-Saxon era. Prehistoric mammoth ivory was another possibility. The bag rings are circular and of a larger diameter than the oval, narrow walrus tusks, however, and in several instances, radiocarbon dating of the rings contradicted the mammoth hypothesis.

Between 2017 and 2019, an excavation of an Anglo-Saxon cemetery in Scremby, Lincolnshire, unearthed 49 inhumations, seven of them containingi the remains of adult females with circular ivory rings at their hips. Researchers have undertaken a multidisciplinary analysis of five of the rings from the Scremby burials in the hopes of pinpointing the origin of the ivory. Radiocarbon dating was employed to confirm the era of the elephantid species, Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) to distinguish between Asian and African elephantid species and strontium isotope analysis to determine where the animals lived at the time the tusks were formed.

Radiocarbon dating found that the ivory was roughly contemporaneous with the burials, dating between 428 and 598 A.D. This rules out mammoths, the last of which had died out in Siberia 2,500 years before that. ZooMS identified the Scremby ivories as African elephant. Strontium isotope analysis narrowed down the probable biosphere range of the elephants to the East African Rift Valley in what are now Kenya and Ethiopia.

Armed with this information, researchers believe the elephant ivory was traded by the Kingdom of Aksum in what is now Eritrea. The powerful kingdom had dominated trade in the Red Sea after the fall of Rome, and archaeological evidence of ivory working as late as the 6th century has been found at Aksum sites. The lack of ivory waste at Anglo-Saxon sites indicates the rings were manufactured elsewhere and imported into England. Aksum’s ivory trade declined in the 7th century with the Islamic conquests in North Africa and African ivory was rerouted to China and India where demand was high. In addition to a sharp decline in the supply of elephant ivory rings, the shift in funerary practices as Anglo-Saxons became increasingly Christianized may have decreased demand, a combination that led to disappearance of African elephant ivory bag rings on the archaeological record in the 7th century A.D.

3 thoughts on “Anglo-Saxon bag rings made of African elephant ivory

  1. It probably ALL comes back in circles. My mom alone owns SEVERAL(!) East African handbags exported to Germany by a friend in Mombasa. There is leather (and sisal), but hardly any ivory being used (though, unsure about similar rings):

    The “Benin Bronzes” were a group of several thousand metal plaques and sculptures that decorated the royal palace of the Kingdom of Benin, mostly made of brass of variable composition.

    “Manillas”, on the other hand, are a form of commodity money, usually made of bronze or copper, being used in West Africa.

    Benin Bronzes were part of the booty of the British 1897 punitive expedition: one portion ended up in the private collections of various British officials; others later ended up in various European museums, mainly in Germany, and in American museums. The Germans declared the restitution of “looted” bronzes in public collections by 2022.

    FUN FACT: Some of the “bronzes” depict German and Portuguese 16th century soldiers, and Jakob Fugger (1459-1525) had been in business with copper from Hungary, as well with England and the Portuguese. Moreover, it turns out that the materials that in 2021 in the Rhineland were to be handed back, originally came from the Rhineland itself 😀

    Cf.: Skowronek T. et al. (2023) “German brass for Benin Bronzes: Geochemical analysis insights into the early Atlantic trade”. PLoS ONE 18(4): e0283415.

    ——
    Abstract: “Utilizing geochemical analysis, this study identifies the sources of European brass used in the casting of the renowned Benin Bronzes, produced by the Edo people of Nigeria. It is commonly believed that distinctive brass rings known as “manillas”, used as currency in the European trade in West Africa, also served as a metal source for the making of the Bronzes. However, prior to the current study, no research had conclusively connected the Benin artworks and the European manillas. For this research, manillas from shipwrecks in African, American and European waters dating between the 16th and 19th Century were analysed using ICP-MS analysis. Comparing trace elements and lead isotope ratios of manillas and Benin Bronzes identifies Germany as the principal source of the manillas used in the West African trade between the 15th and 18th centuries before British industries took over the brass trade in the late 18th century.”
    ——

  2. I wonder if the Anglo-Saxons knew it was from an elephant/big beast or just admired it for the way it looked.

    1. Very interesting.i lived in Northern and Southern Rhodesia 1952 to 65 and remember seeing ivory rings,not many. My father said they probably came from Kenya and Mombassa

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.