Brown University librarian finds rare Paul Revere print

"Buried with Him by Baptism," engraved print by Paul RevereMarie Malchodi, a technical assistant in the preservation department of Brown University’s John Hay Library, was looking through a collection of books donated by Solomon Drowne, a physician and graduate of Brown’s class of 1773, when she came across an engraved print stuffed inside the back cover of the 1811 edition of The Modern Practice of Physic by Robert Thomas. Labeled “Buried with Him by Baptism,” the print is an engraving of Jesus being baptized by John in the river Jordan. A crowd of onlookers watch from the shore while angels look down from on high. God is represented by a sun with Hebrew lettering inside. (EDIT: the lettering is YHWH in reverse. Revere neglected to engrave the lettering on the plate backwards so all the prints he made from that plate spell the name of the God backwards instead.) He speaks through one of the rays of the sun saying: “This is my beloved Son, – hear ye him.”

The design is not what you would call top of the notch. Dürer was in no danger of being eclipsed by this particular printmaker. It was the “P. Revere Sculp” signature in the bottom right that made Malchodi realize the piece might be historically significant. She brought it to Richard Noble, the rare materials cataloguer for the John Hay Library, and he recognized the style as typical of the work of silversmith and Revolutionary War hero Paul Revere’s print work. “That’s just crude enough to be him,” is how he put it.

Noble did some research to see if he could confirm the print was made by Paul Revere. He found out that not only is the print documented as one of Paul Revere’s engravings, but it’s extremely rare with only four other copies known to exist. Even rarer, this print is the only one of the five to have the full plate mark visible. The other four have been cropped, removing the mark left by the edges of the metal plate when it was pressed against the paper.

“The Bloody Massacre perpetrated in King Street, Boston on March 5th 1770 by a party of the 29th Regiment,” engraving by Paul RevereRevere began making prints in 1765, most of them on political themes supporting the colonial cause. He didn’t always make the original drawing, however. One of his best known prints, “The Bloody Massacre perpetrated in King Street, Boston on March 5th 1770 by a party of the 29th Regiment” was copied from an original drawing by Henry Pelham.

Why did Revere create the print in the first place? How did the Drowne family come to own it? Based on Jesus and John’s position chest-high in the water, Noble categorizes it as a theo-political cartoon depicting a Baptist ceremony. In his book, Brigham indicates that he could find no evidence that it was ever used publicly in a book or religious pamphlet. He also could find no model in any British book or periodical that Revere might have used as inspiration for this style of baptism depiction. Noble believes it may have been a one-off printing, meaning that Revere only made a few at a time to give to friends and close acquaintances who requested it, which also explains why the print is so rare.

“It appears to be an American original, by an American original. The son of French Huguenot refugees who eventually became, by all accounts, a Unitarian. The print thus marks a stage in the evolution of that aspect of Revere’s life,” Noble said.

Solomon Drowne and his family were prominent members of the First Baptist Church of Providence, Rhode Island, also known as the First Baptist Church in America because it was in fact the first Baptist church in America, founded by Roger Williams in 1638. Drowne was dedicated to the Revolutionary cause, serving as a surgeon for the Continental Army from 1776 to 1780 and then as ship’s surgeon on the privateer sloop Hope. (He published a journal about his time on board the Hope; pdf here.) It’s certainly conceivable that Paul Revere might have given the print to Drowne, but he could have gotten it any number of ways.

Share

RSS feed

9 Comments »

Comment by Ghulam
2012-04-14 00:46:15

from the article: “That’s just crude enough to be him,” is how he put it.

One might well say of Mr. Noble’s remark that it was stated crudely enough to be he.

 
Comment by Ghulam
2012-04-14 01:06:27

Many years ago I took the Ulpan Hebrew course for immigrants to Israel, and I had three years of college and grad school classical Hebrew, and I have no idea what those Hebrew letters mean. I did not dig very deeply into this, and my Hebrew is rusty, but they correlate to no word for God or heaven with which I am familiar. That is not Jehova or YHWH. What it might be is an attempt to spell out the English word “heaven” using a vague understanding of the sound of Hebrew letters.

 
Comment by Richard Noble
2012-04-16 10:17:18

Yes, it’s me. Crude, I grant you, but colloquially idiomatic–a case of the “objective of specification”.

Richard Noble (oh, him …)

Comment by livius drusus
2012-04-19 15:49:44

Fess up: you Googled your name, didn’t you? ;)

 
 
Comment by Richard Noble
2012-04-16 10:23:44

Ghulam commented, “That is not Jehova or YHWH. What it might be is an attempt to spell out the English word ‘heaven’ using a vague understanding of the sound of Hebrew letters.”

This is something that, given my background,I didn’t notice at once. It is indeed the Tetragrammaton, but rendered in reverse, and a clue that this may well have been an early exercise on Revere’s part. Reverse lettering is a sign of inexperience in the making of engravings and woodcuts. I suppose that Revere was copying from some source directly onto the plate, without remembering that he had to engrave it backwards to make it come out right.

Comment by livius drusus
2012-04-19 15:35:06

Well, that explains that. Thank you kindly. I’ll edit your comment into the post so future Googlers can be illuminated.

Was Revere’s later work much improved, then, or did his crude technique remain consistently crude over the years?

 
 
Comment by FMJohnson
2012-04-21 08:09:47

The “reverse error in etching” phenomenon also arose when Picasso did his first etching, of a bullfighter. When he saw the finished print and realized the picador’s spike was now in his left hand, he called it “El Zurdo” — the left-hander.

Also, why is no one making more of a connection between Solomon Drowne (a Baptist) and Brown University (originally a Baptist school) and this print of Christ being immersed? It seems to me Revere may have had a significant connection with the Baptist community in New England and/or Rhode Island, perhaps even with Drowne personally.

For example, your piece mentions that “Drowne was dedicated to the Revolutionary cause, serving as a surgeon for the Continental Army from 1776 to 1780.” According to Wikipedia, Revere was briefly deployed to Rhode Island in September 1777 and to Providence in 1778.

In any case, I think there’s an obvious connection among these Baptist people and institutions, and a clearly Baptist representation of Christ’s baptism.

 
Comment by ashee
2012-04-23 10:13:34

woh very nice pic

asheeee.blogspot.com

 
Comment by John
2012-05-05 07:12:00

In all European languages the letters I, J, and Y were often substituted one for the other in early printed texts. Moreover, since vowels are frequently omitted when Semitic languages are written or printed, YHWH can, indeed, be read aloud as “Jehovah.” This convention is centuries old.

 
Name
E-mail
URI

;) :yes: :thanks: :skull: :shifty: :p :ohnoes: :notworthy: :no: :love: :lol: :hattip: :giggle: :facepalm: :evil: :eek: :cry: :cool: :confused: :chicken: :boogie: :blush: :blankstare: :angry: :D :) :(

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.